James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
U.S.-based agrochemical giant Monsanto Co. is currently negotiating a $45 billion buyout proposal of rival Syngenta as a tax inversion strategy to relocate to the UK, according to the Financial Times.
If Monsanto’s proposed tax inversion plan is accepted, this would mark the largest tax inversion in U.S. history with estimated annual savings close to $500 million.
Monsanto’s proposed tax inversion plan seeks tax savings.
According to Monsanto CEO and Chairman Hugh Grant, the merger is designed to encompass the two corporations into a global agribusiness enterprise to expand geographical outreach. However, the tax inversion acquisition would effectively reduce Monsanto’s tax rate from 29 percent to 15 percent, the WSJ reported. Britain is an ideal location for overseas subsidiaries to set up headquarters because of its 20 percent tax rate, which includes additional tax incentives for foreign-based entities.
The impact on global agribusiness
This merger would become the largest ever agribusiness takeover, which would effectively monopolize the global seeds and chemicals markets, the WSJ report noted. Monsanto and Syngenta combined for $57 billion in pesticide sales alone in 2014, with a 30 percent market share on pesticides, and another 45 percent market share for seeds. Together, the two companies would generate $600 million in new revenue, increasing cash-earnings-per-share by over 16 percent from the tax savings and benefits structure in Britain, according to a report in Bloomberg Business.
Ultimately, farmers would be most affected by the deal because it could significantly change all agribusiness sectors. According to John Hansen, President of the Nebraska Farmers Union and a prominent board member of the National Farmers Union, the deal would eliminate competition.
“When you have that much market power, there’s too much money to be made using your market power to push the company’s interests forward,” Hansen said.
Criticism from the US government
President Obama has been an outspoken critic of tax inversions because these strategies manipulate the tax system and diminish the U.S. tax base. Several other Congressman have been critical of tax inversions as well, including Senator Richard Durbin who argued that rules should be enacted to block these strategies.
“It’s clear that Monsanto – a company that has prospered and expanded in large part due to U.S. taxpayer-funded programs and services – intends to reincorporate overseas as part of its proposed acquisition of Syngenta in order to avoid paying U.S. taxes,” he argued. “Hundreds of millions of dollars that could be invested in the infrastructure, education and research that companies rely on will be lost if Monsanto is allowed to go through with this corporate inversion scheme.”
In fact, several Democrats have proposed an overhaul of the federal tax system where corporations like Monsanto would continue to pay U.S. tax rates overseas. According to USA Today, with involvement from U.S. politicians, the floodgates have opened to eliminate the tax inversion loophole altogether.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Monsanto's Proposed Tax Inversion Plan
Author: James F. McDonough
U.S.-based agrochemical giant Monsanto Co. is currently negotiating a $45 billion buyout proposal of rival Syngenta as a tax inversion strategy to relocate to the UK, according to the Financial Times.
If Monsanto’s proposed tax inversion plan is accepted, this would mark the largest tax inversion in U.S. history with estimated annual savings close to $500 million.
Monsanto’s proposed tax inversion plan seeks tax savings.
According to Monsanto CEO and Chairman Hugh Grant, the merger is designed to encompass the two corporations into a global agribusiness enterprise to expand geographical outreach. However, the tax inversion acquisition would effectively reduce Monsanto’s tax rate from 29 percent to 15 percent, the WSJ reported. Britain is an ideal location for overseas subsidiaries to set up headquarters because of its 20 percent tax rate, which includes additional tax incentives for foreign-based entities.
The impact on global agribusiness
This merger would become the largest ever agribusiness takeover, which would effectively monopolize the global seeds and chemicals markets, the WSJ report noted. Monsanto and Syngenta combined for $57 billion in pesticide sales alone in 2014, with a 30 percent market share on pesticides, and another 45 percent market share for seeds. Together, the two companies would generate $600 million in new revenue, increasing cash-earnings-per-share by over 16 percent from the tax savings and benefits structure in Britain, according to a report in Bloomberg Business.
Ultimately, farmers would be most affected by the deal because it could significantly change all agribusiness sectors. According to John Hansen, President of the Nebraska Farmers Union and a prominent board member of the National Farmers Union, the deal would eliminate competition.
“When you have that much market power, there’s too much money to be made using your market power to push the company’s interests forward,” Hansen said.
Criticism from the US government
President Obama has been an outspoken critic of tax inversions because these strategies manipulate the tax system and diminish the U.S. tax base. Several other Congressman have been critical of tax inversions as well, including Senator Richard Durbin who argued that rules should be enacted to block these strategies.
“It’s clear that Monsanto – a company that has prospered and expanded in large part due to U.S. taxpayer-funded programs and services – intends to reincorporate overseas as part of its proposed acquisition of Syngenta in order to avoid paying U.S. taxes,” he argued. “Hundreds of millions of dollars that could be invested in the infrastructure, education and research that companies rely on will be lost if Monsanto is allowed to go through with this corporate inversion scheme.”
In fact, several Democrats have proposed an overhaul of the federal tax system where corporations like Monsanto would continue to pay U.S. tax rates overseas. According to USA Today, with involvement from U.S. politicians, the floodgates have opened to eliminate the tax inversion loophole altogether.