
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: August 26, 2014
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comApollo Global Management-owned silicone and quartz producer Momentive Performance Materials recently began a week of bankruptcy hearings to determine whether its plan to shed $3 billion of debt will be approved.
Momentive filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in April after failing to turn a profit since its acquisition by Apollo in 2006, according to Bloomberg.
The New York-based company filed for bankruptcy with an agreement to transfer control to one class of bondholders, despite strong opposition from other creditors, Reuters reported. The deal hinges on a $1.3 billion loan from JPMorgan Chase & Co. and a rights offering to holders of second-lien bonds worth $600 million. This would allow the second-lien bondholders to receive Momentive’s equity.
While a large number of the company’s other creditors are strongly opposed to the deal as it stands now, most rest on a few lines of the contract, the news source explained. If Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain sides with creditors in his interpretation of these lines early on, the rest of the four days set aside for bankruptcy hearings may be obviated.
The main objection comes from Momentive’s junior bondholders, led by U.S. Bank NA, according to Reuters. These creditors would recover nothing under the plan. U.S. Bank is owed approximately $382 million, and says that it cannot be put behind other creditors in the payback line. Momentive is citing contract language that puts the bank’s debt behind other creditors, but U.S. Bank maintains that this clause only applies to senior secured lenders. If Drain sides with U.S. Bank, Momentive will have to start work an a new plan of restructuring.
Some creditors have also noted that Apollo Global Management is getting a so-called “sweetheart” deal in this bankruptcy, as it owns Momentive and holds some of its second-lien debt.
“It’s like doing a deal with your wife,” a source told Reuters. “If the other side wins, you still win.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Apollo Global Management-owned silicone and quartz producer Momentive Performance Materials recently began a week of bankruptcy hearings to determine whether its plan to shed $3 billion of debt will be approved.
Momentive filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in April after failing to turn a profit since its acquisition by Apollo in 2006, according to Bloomberg.
The New York-based company filed for bankruptcy with an agreement to transfer control to one class of bondholders, despite strong opposition from other creditors, Reuters reported. The deal hinges on a $1.3 billion loan from JPMorgan Chase & Co. and a rights offering to holders of second-lien bonds worth $600 million. This would allow the second-lien bondholders to receive Momentive’s equity.
While a large number of the company’s other creditors are strongly opposed to the deal as it stands now, most rest on a few lines of the contract, the news source explained. If Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain sides with creditors in his interpretation of these lines early on, the rest of the four days set aside for bankruptcy hearings may be obviated.
The main objection comes from Momentive’s junior bondholders, led by U.S. Bank NA, according to Reuters. These creditors would recover nothing under the plan. U.S. Bank is owed approximately $382 million, and says that it cannot be put behind other creditors in the payback line. Momentive is citing contract language that puts the bank’s debt behind other creditors, but U.S. Bank maintains that this clause only applies to senior secured lenders. If Drain sides with U.S. Bank, Momentive will have to start work an a new plan of restructuring.
Some creditors have also noted that Apollo Global Management is getting a so-called “sweetheart” deal in this bankruptcy, as it owns Momentive and holds some of its second-lien debt.
“It’s like doing a deal with your wife,” a source told Reuters. “If the other side wins, you still win.”
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!