Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 8, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) has become a hot topic of conversation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given that there are many misconceptions, it is important for businesses to understand how HIPAA’s Privacy Rule works and what types of health information are protected.
The HIPAA Privacy Rule establishes national standards to protect individuals’ medical records and other personal health information. It does not apply to all businesses, but only “covered entities,” such as health plans, health care clearinghouses, and those health care providers that conduct certain health care transactions electronically. Accordingly, employers are not generally covered.
When it does apply, the HIPAA Privacy Rule requires appropriate safeguards to protect the privacy of “individually identifiable health information,” which is defined as information, including demographic data, that relates to:
Notably, the Privacy Rule excludes from protected health information employment records that a covered entity maintains in its capacity as an employer.
The goal of HIPAA’s Privacy Rule is to establish limits and conditions on the uses and disclosures that may be made of such information without patient authorization. The Privacy Rule also gives patients certain rights over their health information, including rights to examine and to obtain a copy of their health records and to request corrections.
The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR) recently issued new guidance regarding when and how HIPAA applies to uses and disclosures of COVID-19 vaccination-related information (Guidance). To start, the guidance addresses a common misconception about whether businesses can ask employees and customers about their vaccination status, clarifying that the HIPAA Privacy Rule does not prohibit businesses or individuals from asking whether their customers or clients have received a COVID-19 vaccine. As the guidance explains:
[T]he Privacy Rule does not regulate the ability of covered entities and business associates to request information from patients or visitors. Rather, the Privacy Rule regulates how and when covered entities and business associates are permitted to use and disclose protected health information (PHI) (e.g., PHI about whether an individual has received a COVID-19 vaccine) that covered entities and business associates create, receive, maintain, or transmit. Thus, the Privacy Rule does not prohibit a covered entity (e.g., a covered doctor, hospital, or health plan) or business associate from asking whether an individual (e.g., a patient or visitor) has received a particular vaccine, including COVID-19 vaccines, although it does regulate how and when a covered entity or its business associate may use or disclose information about an individual’s vaccination status.
As further explained in the Guidance, the Privacy Rule also does not apply when an individual:
The Guidance also addresses whether the Privacy Rule prevents an individual from disclosing whether that individual has been vaccinated against COVID-19 or any other disease. “The Privacy Rule does not apply to individuals’ disclosures about their own health information. It applies only to covered entities and, to some extent their business associates,” the Guidance states. “Therefore, the Privacy Rule does not apply when an individual tells another person, such as a colleague or business owner, about their own vaccination status.”
Another area where HIPAA-related COVID-19 vaccine questions arise is mandatory workplace disclosures. As set forth in the Guidance, the HIPAA Privacy Rule does not prohibit an employer from requiring a workforce member to disclose whether they have received a COVID-19 vaccine to the employer, clients, or other parties, even if they are covered entities under the law.
“The Privacy Rule does not apply to employment records, including employment records held by covered entities and business associates acting in their capacity as employers,” OCR advises. “Thus, the Privacy Rule generally does not regulate what information can be requested from employees as part of the terms and conditions of employment that a covered entity or business associate may impose on its workforce, such as the ability of a covered entity or business associate to require its workforce members to provide documentation of their vaccination against COVID-19 or to disclose whether they have been vaccinated to their employer, other workforce members, patients, or members of the public.”
Additionally, the Guidance provides that the Privacy Rule does not prohibit a covered entity or business associate from requiring or requesting each workforce member to:
Finally, the Guidance addresses situations where HIPAA does apply. Most notably, the Privacy Rule generally would prohibit a doctor’s office from disclosing an individual’s PHI, including whether they have received a COVID-19 vaccine, to the individual’s employer or other parties.
COVID-19 vaccination continues to be a controversial issue. For businesses, it is imperative to thoroughly understand your legal rights and obligations. To boost compliance and avoid unintended liability, it is always advisable to work with experienced counsel when drafting and implementing any COVID-19 policies, including those governing vaccination.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jorge R. de Armas or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!