Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
A new study on merger and acquisition (M&A) litigation in 2014 reveals several significant trends.
Most notably, the majority of all lawsuits were filed in one jurisdiction, suggesting that companies are increasingly incorporating forum-selection clauses into their corporate bylaws as well as into their transaction documents, when it comes to a merger and acquisition.
As previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, forum selection clauses are common in business contracts, particularly those involving parties that are not located in the same state. In essence, a well-crafted forum clause provides that if a business dispute arises, it must be resolved in a court local to you.
To ward off multi-district shareholder litigation, many corporate bylaws now include provisions that indicate that the courts of a certain state —often Delaware — have exclusive jurisdiction for lawsuits alleging breach of fiduciary duties. According to Cornerstone Research, it appears to be working.
The study analyzed litigation challenging merger and acquisition deals valued over $100 million announced from 2007 through 2014, filed by shareholders of public target companies. It found that 60 percent of shareholder lawsuits challenging a proposed merger or acquisition were filed in only one jurisdiction.In addition, only four percent of the transactions were challenged in more than two courts. By comparison, the figure was 20 percent in 2011.
Overall, the study found that merger and acquisition litigation decreased slightly in 2014. Below are several other key trends detailed in Cornerstone’s report:
- Approximately 96 percent of deals valued over $1 billion were challenged in litigation, but the percentage of deals valued under $1 billion that were challenged dropped from 94 percent in 2013 to 89 percent in 2014.
- The average number of lawsuits per deal decreased, from 5.2 in 2013 to 4.5 in 2014.
- Lawsuits were filed more slowly last year. The first lawsuit was filed an average of 14 days after the transaction was announced, compared with 11 days in both 2012 and 2013.
- The majority of the resolved 2014 merger and acquisition litigation settled. More specifically, nearly 60 percent of lawsuits were resolved before deals closed, the lowest level since 2008.
As the study highlights, large merger and acquisition deals involving public companies are likely to result in at least one lawsuit. To help deter the burden and expense of litigation, companies should take advantage of legal tools such as forum selection clauses.
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Merger & Acquisition Litigation Trends
Author: Dan Brecher
A new study on merger and acquisition (M&A) litigation in 2014 reveals several significant trends.
Most notably, the majority of all lawsuits were filed in one jurisdiction, suggesting that companies are increasingly incorporating forum-selection clauses into their corporate bylaws as well as into their transaction documents, when it comes to a merger and acquisition.
As previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, forum selection clauses are common in business contracts, particularly those involving parties that are not located in the same state. In essence, a well-crafted forum clause provides that if a business dispute arises, it must be resolved in a court local to you.
To ward off multi-district shareholder litigation, many corporate bylaws now include provisions that indicate that the courts of a certain state —often Delaware — have exclusive jurisdiction for lawsuits alleging breach of fiduciary duties. According to Cornerstone Research, it appears to be working.
The study analyzed litigation challenging merger and acquisition deals valued over $100 million announced from 2007 through 2014, filed by shareholders of public target companies. It found that 60 percent of shareholder lawsuits challenging a proposed merger or acquisition were filed in only one jurisdiction.In addition, only four percent of the transactions were challenged in more than two courts. By comparison, the figure was 20 percent in 2011.
Overall, the study found that merger and acquisition litigation decreased slightly in 2014. Below are several other key trends detailed in Cornerstone’s report:
- Approximately 96 percent of deals valued over $1 billion were challenged in litigation, but the percentage of deals valued under $1 billion that were challenged dropped from 94 percent in 2013 to 89 percent in 2014.
- The average number of lawsuits per deal decreased, from 5.2 in 2013 to 4.5 in 2014.
- Lawsuits were filed more slowly last year. The first lawsuit was filed an average of 14 days after the transaction was announced, compared with 11 days in both 2012 and 2013.
- The majority of the resolved 2014 merger and acquisition litigation settled. More specifically, nearly 60 percent of lawsuits were resolved before deals closed, the lowest level since 2008.
As the study highlights, large merger and acquisition deals involving public companies are likely to result in at least one lawsuit. To help deter the burden and expense of litigation, companies should take advantage of legal tools such as forum selection clauses.