Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Mediate or Arbitrate? Which Works Best for You?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 17, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
To mediate or arbitrate. That is the question.
Recording artists and their labels often get into disputes over their contracts, and when this happens there are typically three options: Litigate, mediate or arbitrate. Often it is best, and less costly, to avoid the first option, so, what is the difference between mediation and arbitration?
Any given recording contract may include a clause specifying whether, in the case of a dispute, the two parties will take the issue to an arbitrator. If arbitration isn’t the go-to option, then mediation is an alternative they may agree on. While both help the two parties settle their dispute outside of court, there are differences between the two, and so it is important to understand them before deciding which route to go in case of a disagreement. So will you mediate or arbitrate? Perhaps after reading, you’ll be able to make an educated decision.
Arbitration
The concept of a third-party arbitrator has been coming up in the news plenty in recent months due to the NFL’s headline-dominating Deflategate scandal, but arbitration processes are part of all sorts of agreements, including recording contracts. If an artist gets into a dispute with his or her label over the royalties for the musician’s latest album, and the contract calls for the dispute to go to arbitration in such cases, the conflict will go to a neutral third-party charged with making a decision. Whatever that ultimate determination is, it is typically legally binding.
Arbitration is often a better route than going to court because it is a faster process typically tailored to the specific clause in dispute. Additionally, when the two parties meet with an arbitrator their discussions are not required to be made public, which can prove beneficial to both sides.
Arbitration, however, still has its downsides. For example, typically there is a winner and a loser, just as there is when a disagreement is brought to court. One party will usually walk away from the discussions disappointed. Arbitration is also similar to going to court in that the talks usually move along in accordance with the law, due to the legally binding nature of the third-party arbitrator’s decision. There is less flexibility here than with mediation.
Mediation
Mediation may be desirable because, unlike arbitration, the process is more flexible and more prone to back-and-forth negotiation. It is more of a mutual discussion guided by a neutral third-party, than a presentation of evidence to an arbitrator. The less legally binding nature of mediation offers many more possibilities in terms of coming to an agreement. Since the two parties and the neutral mediator all have a hand in coming to an agreement, it can be crafted down to even the tiniest details. The unique proceedings of mediation also reduce the chance of damage to the relationship between the two parties, which can prevent further dispute down the road.
Due to the fact that all three parties are deeply involved in mediation, and the ultimate agreement can be much more detailed, this process is sometimes slower than arbitration. If both parties prefer a faster and more formal process, than mediation probably is not the way to go.
A recording contract may also call for both mediation and arbitration. In these cases, it would specify that if mediation does not result in an agreement that works for both parties, then the dispute should move to arbitration.
So will you mediate or arbitrate?
If you’re not sure whether to mediate or arbitrate when it comes to drafting a recording contract, contact an attorney who can help you further explore the advantages and disadvantages of each in your specific situation.
- Industries: Entertainment & Media
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Mediate or Arbitrate? Which Works Best for You?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
To mediate or arbitrate. That is the question.
Recording artists and their labels often get into disputes over their contracts, and when this happens there are typically three options: Litigate, mediate or arbitrate. Often it is best, and less costly, to avoid the first option, so, what is the difference between mediation and arbitration?
Any given recording contract may include a clause specifying whether, in the case of a dispute, the two parties will take the issue to an arbitrator. If arbitration isn’t the go-to option, then mediation is an alternative they may agree on. While both help the two parties settle their dispute outside of court, there are differences between the two, and so it is important to understand them before deciding which route to go in case of a disagreement. So will you mediate or arbitrate? Perhaps after reading, you’ll be able to make an educated decision.
Arbitration
The concept of a third-party arbitrator has been coming up in the news plenty in recent months due to the NFL’s headline-dominating Deflategate scandal, but arbitration processes are part of all sorts of agreements, including recording contracts. If an artist gets into a dispute with his or her label over the royalties for the musician’s latest album, and the contract calls for the dispute to go to arbitration in such cases, the conflict will go to a neutral third-party charged with making a decision. Whatever that ultimate determination is, it is typically legally binding.
Arbitration is often a better route than going to court because it is a faster process typically tailored to the specific clause in dispute. Additionally, when the two parties meet with an arbitrator their discussions are not required to be made public, which can prove beneficial to both sides.
Arbitration, however, still has its downsides. For example, typically there is a winner and a loser, just as there is when a disagreement is brought to court. One party will usually walk away from the discussions disappointed. Arbitration is also similar to going to court in that the talks usually move along in accordance with the law, due to the legally binding nature of the third-party arbitrator’s decision. There is less flexibility here than with mediation.
Mediation
Mediation may be desirable because, unlike arbitration, the process is more flexible and more prone to back-and-forth negotiation. It is more of a mutual discussion guided by a neutral third-party, than a presentation of evidence to an arbitrator. The less legally binding nature of mediation offers many more possibilities in terms of coming to an agreement. Since the two parties and the neutral mediator all have a hand in coming to an agreement, it can be crafted down to even the tiniest details. The unique proceedings of mediation also reduce the chance of damage to the relationship between the two parties, which can prevent further dispute down the road.
Due to the fact that all three parties are deeply involved in mediation, and the ultimate agreement can be much more detailed, this process is sometimes slower than arbitration. If both parties prefer a faster and more formal process, than mediation probably is not the way to go.
A recording contract may also call for both mediation and arbitration. In these cases, it would specify that if mediation does not result in an agreement that works for both parties, then the dispute should move to arbitration.
So will you mediate or arbitrate?
If you’re not sure whether to mediate or arbitrate when it comes to drafting a recording contract, contact an attorney who can help you further explore the advantages and disadvantages of each in your specific situation.