Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 17, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comA Nevada cannabis company must rebrand its products after being hit with a trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit highlights that as the marijuana industry gains legitimacy, businesses must adopt traditional intellectual property strategies, such as conducting a trademark search before expending resources to promote a brand or product.

In March, Gorilla Glue Co. filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against GG Strains LLC over the name of its award-winning Gorilla Glue 4 cannabis strain. The suit alleged that GG Strains was unlawfully advertising and selling products and services under a confusingly similar name to Gorilla Glue’s trademarks, in violation and dilution of Gorilla Glue’s trademark rights. It further maintained that “the name of Defendant’s product was selected with the express purpose to exploit and trade on the goodwill and reputation for strength and stickiness that Gorilla Glue had built in its GORILLA GLUE mark.”
In its complaint, Gorilla Glue noted that it filed the suit solely to protect its intellectual property rights. It stated:
This lawsuit is not a comment on any federal or state policy matters, medical or pharmaceutical issues, or choices in recreation. GG Strains not only took the name but intentionally traded on Gorilla Glue’s reputation for high-quality adhesives’ ‘stickiness.’
The two companies recently agreed to settle the trademark dispute. Under the terms of the settlement:
Marijuana companies that have adopted product names and guerilla marketing tactics that “play on” the intellectual property of established brands may face infringement claims. For example, mainstream companies, including Hershey and Girl Scouts of America, have pursued legal actions against cannabis companies over the sale of marijuana strains with allegedly infringing names.
Businesses can establish legal rights in a trademark based on the use of the mark in commerce without seeking registration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. However, federal registration has a number of benefits, including public notice of your claim of ownership of the mark; a legal presumption of your ownership of the mark and your exclusive right to use the mark nationwide on or in connection with the goods/services listed in the registration; and the ability to bring an action concerning the mark in federal court.
Because marijuana is still illegal under federal law, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has refused federal registration of medical marijuana and other cannabis-related trademarks. Nonetheless, it is still advisable to conduct a trademark search. Conducting a trademark search can help ensure your company logo or brand will not be “confusingly similar” to an existing mark, and also prevents you from wasting substantial resources, including time and money on marketing materials and advertisements that feature a company logo or name that already belongs to someone else. A founder of GG Strains estimated that the dispute and rebranding efforts will cost their company around $250,000.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Crystal Prais, at 201-806-3364.
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

For New Jersey data center owners and operators, a service agreement may look routine when it is signed. The network is functioning, the vendor is meeting its installation schedule, and the parties have agreed on pricing and performance specifications. The provisions that seem most important at that stage are often the technical ones. That changes […]
Author: George McGowan

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Owning a residential rental property in New Jersey involves more than finding tenants and collecting rent. Property owners must comply with a combination of state laws, municipal ordinances, building and housing codes, and zoning and land use regulations. These requirements can affect everything from the number of dwelling units permitted at a property to whether […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!