
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: August 12, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comSignal International LLC, one of the largest marine and fabrication companies on the Gulf Coast, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Sunday, apparently to deal with a $14 million settlement as part of a lawsuit accusing Signal of labor trafficking.
Signal International announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection due to declining oil and gas revenues. However, company executives also claimed that the bankruptcy was filed due to mounting legal fees from 11 lawsuits related to labor trafficking allegations. Signal executives claimed that the Chapter 11 filing was to avoid wasting time and legal costs that would have been incurred from long standing litigation proceedings.
Although the company’s goal is to maintain operations by resolving litigation through the bankruptcy process, Signal International is seeking approval from the bankruptcy court for an agreement with their pre-bankruptcy secured lender for $20 million in additional financing. The company also intends to sell off assets through an auction to the highest bidder under the oversight of the bankruptcy court. The firm has reached an agreement with its pre-bankruptcy secured lender to serve as the stalking horse bidder during the auction. Signal International has retained SSG Capital Advisors LLC to oversee the open market sale auction, which is expected to be completed within a 100-day period.
Signal International was charged in lawsuits with the labor trafficking of Indian citizens who were recruited to work for the company in the U.S. following Hurricane Katrina. The initial lawsuit involved five Indian citizens paid between $10,000 to $20,000 for shipyard jobs who claimed that Signal had promised them permanent residency in the U.S. as part of the U.S. government’s H-2B guest worker program. The suit also claimed that Signal forced the workers to pay over $1,000 per month to live in unsanitary conditions at heavily guarded facilities akin to labor camps. As a result, a federal court awarded $14 million in damages to the plaintiffs.
The company also reported that there are 11 additional lawsuits involving 227 more citizens recruited from India under similarly illegal conditions. These lawsuits include a $20 million settlement to be shared among the workers involved in the case.
In a statement regarding the case, Signal International representatives reported that the claims were “meritless” and that the federal court rulings adversely affected the company’s defense. Currently though, the company has reached settlements with several of the plaintiffs and issued a formal apology to the workers involved for forcing them to live and work under adverse conditions.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!