Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Madoff Redux: Trial of Madoff Employees to Commence
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 18, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The public is set to get its first in-depth look at one of the biggest frauds in U.S. history. The criminal trial of five former employees of Bernard Madoff begins in New York this month.
While Madoff claims to have acted alone, the federal government’s investigation suggests otherwise. Key staff members, ranging from Madoff’s former secretary to computer programmers, face criminal charges of fraud and conspiracy in connection with the $17 billion Ponzi scheme.
The defendants are the only former employees not to accept plea deals and have instead chosen to challenge the government’s evidence against them. Bernie Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 criminal counts and is currently serving a 150-year prison term. While he is not expected to testify, Frank DiPascali, Madoff’s former chief financial officer, has agreed to take the stand for the prosecution in exchange for leniency. His testimony will play a crucial role in explaining how the massive role operated and detailing the specific role each defendant played.
In a separate legal action, Irving H. Picard, the trustee seeking reimbursement on behalf of scorned investors, recently asked the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether he has standing to sue financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase and HSBC Holdings PLC for the role they may have played in aiding the Ponzi scheme. Picard contends that the banks ignored red flags that strongly suggested Madoff was operating a Ponzi scheme.
“Bernard L. Madoff did not act alone,” the brief argues. The scheme “could not have persisted for so long, or defrauded so many of so much, without a network of financial institutions, feeder funds and individuals who participated in his fraud or acquiesced in it — just like any large-scale financial fraud.”
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sided with the bank, holding that because the trustee “stands in the shoes” of Madoff, he could not sue third parties alleged to have aided and abetted the fraud. Other federal courts have ruled differently, increasing the chances for Supreme Court review.
If you have any questions about these cases or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Locations: New York City, Red Bank, NJ, Washington, D.C., Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda
On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
What Are FIRPTA Withholding Requirements?
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Madoff Redux: Trial of Madoff Employees to Commence
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The public is set to get its first in-depth look at one of the biggest frauds in U.S. history. The criminal trial of five former employees of Bernard Madoff begins in New York this month.
While Madoff claims to have acted alone, the federal government’s investigation suggests otherwise. Key staff members, ranging from Madoff’s former secretary to computer programmers, face criminal charges of fraud and conspiracy in connection with the $17 billion Ponzi scheme.
The defendants are the only former employees not to accept plea deals and have instead chosen to challenge the government’s evidence against them. Bernie Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 criminal counts and is currently serving a 150-year prison term. While he is not expected to testify, Frank DiPascali, Madoff’s former chief financial officer, has agreed to take the stand for the prosecution in exchange for leniency. His testimony will play a crucial role in explaining how the massive role operated and detailing the specific role each defendant played.
In a separate legal action, Irving H. Picard, the trustee seeking reimbursement on behalf of scorned investors, recently asked the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether he has standing to sue financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase and HSBC Holdings PLC for the role they may have played in aiding the Ponzi scheme. Picard contends that the banks ignored red flags that strongly suggested Madoff was operating a Ponzi scheme.
“Bernard L. Madoff did not act alone,” the brief argues. The scheme “could not have persisted for so long, or defrauded so many of so much, without a network of financial institutions, feeder funds and individuals who participated in his fraud or acquiesced in it — just like any large-scale financial fraud.”
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sided with the bank, holding that because the trustee “stands in the shoes” of Madoff, he could not sue third parties alleged to have aided and abetted the fraud. Other federal courts have ruled differently, increasing the chances for Supreme Court review.
If you have any questions about these cases or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.