Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Madoff Redux: Trial of Madoff Employees to Commence
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 18, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The public is set to get its first in-depth look at one of the biggest frauds in U.S. history. The criminal trial of five former employees of Bernard Madoff begins in New York this month.
While Madoff claims to have acted alone, the federal government’s investigation suggests otherwise. Key staff members, ranging from Madoff’s former secretary to computer programmers, face criminal charges of fraud and conspiracy in connection with the $17 billion Ponzi scheme.
The defendants are the only former employees not to accept plea deals and have instead chosen to challenge the government’s evidence against them. Bernie Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 criminal counts and is currently serving a 150-year prison term. While he is not expected to testify, Frank DiPascali, Madoff’s former chief financial officer, has agreed to take the stand for the prosecution in exchange for leniency. His testimony will play a crucial role in explaining how the massive role operated and detailing the specific role each defendant played.
In a separate legal action, Irving H. Picard, the trustee seeking reimbursement on behalf of scorned investors, recently asked the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether he has standing to sue financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase and HSBC Holdings PLC for the role they may have played in aiding the Ponzi scheme. Picard contends that the banks ignored red flags that strongly suggested Madoff was operating a Ponzi scheme.
“Bernard L. Madoff did not act alone,” the brief argues. The scheme “could not have persisted for so long, or defrauded so many of so much, without a network of financial institutions, feeder funds and individuals who participated in his fraud or acquiesced in it — just like any large-scale financial fraud.”
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sided with the bank, holding that because the trustee “stands in the shoes” of Madoff, he could not sue third parties alleged to have aided and abetted the fraud. Other federal courts have ruled differently, increasing the chances for Supreme Court review.
If you have any questions about these cases or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Financial Services & Regulatory Practice
- Locations: New York City, Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
When a Child Turns 18: The Gap in Your Family’s Estate Plan
Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.