Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Bill Seeks To Establish Cybersecurity Guidelines for IoT Devices

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: August 23, 2017

Key Contacts

Back

Bi-Partisan Bill Seeks to Establish Cybersecurity Guidelines for IoT Devices 

The U.S. Senate is currently considering the Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017, which would establish baseline cybersecurity standards for federal procurement of IoT devices. The bill would also allow security researchers to look for critical vulnerabilities in devices purchased by the government without fear of prosecution. 

Bill Seeks To Establish Cybersecurity Guidelines for IoT Devices
Photo courtesy of Stocksnap.io

The IoT bill has attracted co-sponsors from both sides of the aisle, including U.S. Sens. Mark R. Warner (D-VA) and Cory Gardner (R-CO), co-chairs of the Senate Cybersecurity Caucus, along with Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Steve Daines (R-MT). The lawmakers drafted the legislation in consultation with technology and security experts from institutions such as the Berklett Cybersecurity Project of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University.

Proliferation of IoT Devices Increases Cyber Risks

The term “Internet of Things” (IoT) refers to the ability of everyday objects, from home security systems to pacemakers, to send and receive data via an Internet connection. Research firm Gartner, Inc. predicts that 8.4 billion connected things will be in use worldwide in 2017, up 31 percent from 2016. The number of IoT devices is expected to reach 20.4 billion by 2020.

As adoption of the technology grows, so do the potential data privacy and cybersecurity risks, including unauthorized access, misuse of personal information, and personal safety concerns. According to Sen. Warner, the worldwide internet outages caused last year by devices infected with the Mirai malware highlighted the need for more robust discussions about securing IoT devices. 

“While I’m tremendously excited about the innovation and productivity that Internet-of-Things devices will unleash, I have long been concerned that too many Internet-connected devices are being sold without appropriate safeguards and protections in place,” said Sen. Warner

Provisions of Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017

The Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017 broadly defines “Internet-Connected Device” to include any “physical object that—(A) is capable of connecting to and is in regular connection with the Internet; and (B) has computer processing capabilities that can collect, send, or receive data.” Among other provisions, the legislation would:

  • Require vendors of Internet-connected devices purchased by the federal government to ensure their devices are patchable, rely on industry standard protocols, do not use hard-coded passwords, and do not contain any known security vulnerabilities.
  • Direct the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to develop alternative network-level security requirements for devices with limited data processing and software functionality.
  • Direct the Department of Homeland Security’s National Protection and Programs Directorate to issue guidelines regarding cybersecurity coordinated vulnerability disclosure policies to be required by contractors providing connected devices to the U.S. Government.
  • Exempt cybersecurity researchers engaging in good-faith research (often called “grey hats”) from liability under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act when engaged in research pursuant to adopted coordinated vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  • Require each executive agency to inventory all Internet-connected devices in use by the agency.

Notably, the requirements would only apply to IoT devices sold to the federal government. However, should the measure advance, additional legislation for consumer-facing devices would likely be forthcoming.

Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below for Fernando M. Pinguelo. If you have any questions about this post, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.

    No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

    Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

    Related Posts

    See all
    Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

    Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

    If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

    Author: Christopher D. Warren

    Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
    The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

    The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

    Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

    Author: Dan Brecher

    Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
    Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

    Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

    Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

    Author: Bryce S. Robins

    Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
    Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

    Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

    Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

    Author: Dan Brecher

    Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
    Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

    Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

    For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

    Author: Bryce S. Robins

    Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
    Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

    Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

    Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

    Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

    Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

    No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

    Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

    Explore What Matters Most to You.

    Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

    Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

    Let`s get in touch!

    * The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

    Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!