James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Levin: Bill limiting corporate inversions later this week
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: May 28, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
The recent spate of corporate inversions, in which a U.S. business merges with a smaller foreign company in order to re-domesticate and thereby enjoy a more favorable tax environment, has much of Washington talking.
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, said May 14 that he will introduce legislation later this week that would limit the ability of U.S. companies to conduct such a maneuver, according to Bloomberg. His bill would alter the rule that sets the minimum requirement for foreign ownership.
At this time, the foreign company only needs to hold a 20 percent stake in the new business that is created, the news source explained. This is favorable to some large U.S. businesses that want to move abroad by purchasing a smaller company but do not want to give up a controlling share in their business. President Barack Obama has proposed raising that minimum to 50 percent.
“If you are serious about stopping people from changing their address to avoid paying taxes, you’ve got to close that loophole,” said Levin, according to Bloomberg.
The Senate’s chief tax writer, Ron Wyden, would like to enact the same provision and date it back to May 8, 2014, according to CNN Money. This rule would likely make two mergers that are right now underway significantly less attractive to the larger U.S. based companies that are pushing for them. Currently Pfizer, a large U.S. pharmaceutical company, is attempting to merge with AstraZeneca, and Valeant is attempting to merge with Allergan.
“There is no policy reason to permit a domestic entity to engage in an inversion transaction when its owners retain a controlling interest in the resulting entity, [and] only minimal operational changes are expected,” the Treasury Department wrote, explaining Obama’s proposal.
Politicians on both sides of the issue would like to see an end to these inversions, but they largely disagree on how they should be stopped. This deadlock may make it difficult to enact any meaningful law.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Levin: Bill limiting corporate inversions later this week
Author: James F. McDonough
The recent spate of corporate inversions, in which a U.S. business merges with a smaller foreign company in order to re-domesticate and thereby enjoy a more favorable tax environment, has much of Washington talking.
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, said May 14 that he will introduce legislation later this week that would limit the ability of U.S. companies to conduct such a maneuver, according to Bloomberg. His bill would alter the rule that sets the minimum requirement for foreign ownership.
At this time, the foreign company only needs to hold a 20 percent stake in the new business that is created, the news source explained. This is favorable to some large U.S. businesses that want to move abroad by purchasing a smaller company but do not want to give up a controlling share in their business. President Barack Obama has proposed raising that minimum to 50 percent.
“If you are serious about stopping people from changing their address to avoid paying taxes, you’ve got to close that loophole,” said Levin, according to Bloomberg.
The Senate’s chief tax writer, Ron Wyden, would like to enact the same provision and date it back to May 8, 2014, according to CNN Money. This rule would likely make two mergers that are right now underway significantly less attractive to the larger U.S. based companies that are pushing for them. Currently Pfizer, a large U.S. pharmaceutical company, is attempting to merge with AstraZeneca, and Valeant is attempting to merge with Allergan.
“There is no policy reason to permit a domestic entity to engage in an inversion transaction when its owners retain a controlling interest in the resulting entity, [and] only minimal operational changes are expected,” the Treasury Department wrote, explaining Obama’s proposal.
Politicians on both sides of the issue would like to see an end to these inversions, but they largely disagree on how they should be stopped. This deadlock may make it difficult to enact any meaningful law.