Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 20, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThis question regarding whether employers reserve the right to search employee emails has become very controversial. It appears that Hillary Clinton is not the only one having her emails scrutinized. Since many workers do not have private email servers and rely on their employers’ electronic communication resources, it is fairly easy for employers to monitor workplace (and non-work) communications.According to a survey by the American Management Association (AMA), more than 50 percent of the responding businesses monitor employee email messages. In addition, 25 percent of the companies report that they have terminated an employee for misusing email.
Nonetheless, the legal principles that govern employers who monitor employee email accounts are complex and evolving. The legal construction of employer surveillance largely depends on the computer, email, or other relevant policies that have been adopted by the employer and communicated to the affected employees. However, in employment lawsuits involving email searches by companies without policies authorizing such searches, the courts have still largely sided with employers, particularly if they had a compelling business reason to read the email.
In City of Ontario v. Quon, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the City of Ontario (California) did not violate the Constitution when it audited the messages exchanged on pagers it provided to members its police SWAT team. In the unanimous decision, the Court held that the text message search did not violate the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable search and seizure because it was legitimately work-related.
“…the legal principles that govern employers who monitor employee email accounts are complex and evolving…”
To avoid liability, employee handbooks should make it clear that employees should have no expectation of privacy when it come to their work email accounts. For instance, the policies may expressly state that the systems are owned by the company and therefore can be accessed without notification or permission. These types of limitations are strengthened to the extent that the employer insists that its email system is used exclusively for business-related communications. It is recommended that employees are officially warned that “electronic files, e-mail, data files, images, software, and voice mail may be accessed at any time by management or other authorized personnel for any business purpose.”Even if the employers’ policies allow searches without notification, it is advised to keep employees apprised of such searches, provided it does not compromise the investigation. For instance, if conducting a sensitive sexual harassment investigation, the employer likely would not want the target employee to be given advance notification until the third party investigation has been completed. However, if management is investigating an email security breach or virus in the system, keeping all employees informed may actually help facilitate the process.
In any case, it is generally good practice to inform employees after the search has been conducted. This not only helps to maintain transparency and trust, but also reminds staff of the relevant policies regarding email monitoring.
This is an area of law that continues to evolve almost daily so it is very important to monitor all developments to insure that your policies align with current legal requirements.
If you have any questions regarding how to deal with your business’ email security or would like to discuss this matter further, please contact me, Gary Young.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!