Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 29, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe policy change will impact 11 notable NYC restaurants, including the Gramercy Tavern, The Modern, and Union Square Café, as well as the 1,800 tipped employees that work in such establishments.
Although there are a number of factors driving this no-tipping business decision, New York’s end-of-the-year tipped employee minimum wage hike from $5 to $7.50 is undoubtedly a major factor. Although many servers at high-end NYC restaurants earn substantial money as tips, little of this will count towards the employer’s responsibility to compensate, even though the tip credit has been an ingrained element of restaurant economics. Restaurant owners also face anticipated increases in the minimum wage for fast-food workers up to $15 an hour, which may tempt kitchen staff to seek higher paid positions at those establishments.
For restaurant owners, eliminating tipping arguably offers a number of advantages. For one thing, it makes employment law compliance and record keeping much less complex. Rather than navigating a dizzying maze of local, state and federal wage regulations applicable to tipped employees, members of the wait staff would be treated like all other non-exempt, hourly workers.
Mr. Meyers further explained that, by raising menu charges for food and beverage to include a service component, the employer is able to reallocate total revenue to narrow the earnings gap between those who make the food and those who serve it. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, gratuities paid to servers cannot be shared with non-tipped employees, such as kitchen staff. “The gap between what the kitchen and dining room workers make has grown by leaps and bounds,” Meyer told the . During his 30-year career in the NYC restaurant industry, “kitchen income has gone up no more than 25 percent. Meanwhile, dining room pay has gone up 200 percent,” he added.
For wait staff, the response is largely mixed. Some would prefer to earn a predictable wage, which eliminates the fear that a slow night can result in a low paycheck. However, other servers are wary that no-tipping policies will eliminate the “upside” income opportunity that comes with big tips for good service.
There are different variations of a no-tipping policy. For instance, Dirt Candy, which is located on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, adds an “administrative fee” of 20 percent to each check. Under the law, if proper legal notice is provided, this is not a “tip” which is defined to be a “voluntary payment made by the patron to the server.” Whatever the name, an imposed service charge is a tip and can be credited to meet the employer’s minimum wage obligations (some jurisdictions will not permit a reallocation of the service charge to pay other employees however). Dirt Candy’s fee helps cover the $15/per hour the restaurant pays its waiters, waitresses, and bar staff. Other eateries are experimenting with raising food prices and imposing other types of services charges.
In the end, Mr. Meyer’s bold move will certainly warrant close attention by the restaurant industry, both inside and outside of the New York City metropolitan area. A crucial factor for success will be whether customers are willing to pay higher prices in exchange for eliminating the need to tip. NYC Restaurants would face potentially higher withholding tax obligations and would no longer be eligible to claim the favorable FICA tip credit. It also remains to be seen whether employees will be willing to work at an establishment which offers higher hourly rates that does not match the potential upside offered by tips.
To discuss how a no-tipping policy may impact your labor compliance obligations and costs please contact attorney Gary S. Young
Related Articles:
Wage-Violations Lawsuits By Restaurant Workers Featured By NJHRA
Wage Employees Sue Restaurant In Wage Disputes
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, like all M&A transactions, it is important to understand the legal nuances and proper due diligence in mergers and acquisitions. What Is a Short Form […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
On January 28, 2025, the Trump Administration terminated Gwynne Wilcox from her position as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board). Gwynne Wilcox, a union side lawyer for Levy Ratner, was confirmed to the Board for an original term in 2021 and confirmed again for a successive five-year term expiring […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!