Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 9, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNew York employers must again review their appearance policies to ensure they comply with the latest amendments to the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL). New York Governor Andrew Cuomo recently signed a bill into law that amends the NYSHRL to expressly prohibit employment discrimination based on attire, clothing, or facial hair worn as a form of religious observance.

The new anti-discrimination law comes on the heels of New York’s new ban on hairstyle discrimination. In July, New York enacted another new law (S.6209A/A.7797A) that amends the NYSHRL and the state’s Dignity for All Students Act to specify that discrimination based on race includes hairstyles or traits associated with race.
As detailed more fully in a separate article, both laws now include subsections that define race to include “traits historically associated with race, including but not limited to hair texture and protective hairstyles.” The new law defines “protective hairstyles” to include, but not be limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, and twists.
New York’s new religious discrimination law (S.04037/A.4204) expressly prohibits employment discrimination based on religious attire, clothing or facial hair. In a press statement, Gov. Cuomo emphasized that “[t]his law will protect people from discriminatory employment practices based on religious attire or facial hair and makes it crystal clear to anyone who may still have doubts that New York has zero tolerance for bigotry of any kind.”
As amended, the NYSHRL now provides:
It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for any employer, or an employee or agent thereof, to impose upon a person as a condition of obtaining or retaining employment, including opportunities for promotion, advancement or transfers, any terms or conditions that would require such person to violate or forego a sincerely held practice of his or her religion, including but not limited to the observance of any particular day or days or any portion thereof as a sabbath or other holy day in accordance with the requirements of his or her religion or the wearing of any attire, clothing, or facial hair in accordance with the requirements of his or her religion, unless, after engaging in a bona fide effort, the employer demonstrates that it is unable to reasonably accommodate the employee’s or prospective employee’s sincerely held religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.
Accordingly, employers can’t refuse to hire, attain, promote, or take other discriminatory action against an individual for wearing attire or facial hair in accordance with the tenets of their religion unless the employer demonstrates that it is unable to reasonably accommodate the employee’s religious practice without undue hardship. The law does not define the terms “attire,” “clothing,” or “facial hair,” or provide examples. However, it is worthwhile to note that the amendment was prompted by a complaint by an employee who was required by his employer to remove his turban or affix a company logo to it.
The new law took effect on October 8, 2019. Employers should be aware that current law already prohibits employers from discriminating against employees based on their religious beliefs. In addition, employers must accommodate an employee’s “sincerely held” religious practices, unless doing so would pose an “undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.” Nonetheless, the new law highlights that appearance policies and dress codes may unintentionally discriminate against those who hold sincere religious beliefs related to garb, attire, and hair. Accordingly, it is advisable to review your policies and procedures to make sure they comply and that your staff understands how to address requests for accommodation.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, we encourage you to contact us at 201-806-3364 or visit Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Attorneys page to learn more about our attorneys and their legal experience.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!