Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe culprit this time? Her hit single “Dark Horse”. Four Christian hip-hop artists, including Marcus Gray, pka Flame; Lecrae Moore, pka Lecrae; Emanuel Lambert and Chike Ojukwu alleged that Perry ripped off the tune to their song, “Joyful Noise”.
The rappers are mad about more than just the alleged theft of the tune. They are also claiming that “Dark Horse” ruined the tune as a result of its association with Perry’s music video, which includes images of “witchcraft”, “paganism”, and “black magic”. The melody in question consists of one note, the minor third, repeated four times, then another note, the minor second, which is repeated three times. For a comparison, here is Katy Perry’s Dark Horse and Flame’s Joyful Noise.
The two songs clearly sound very different, but a comparison of the notes can be seen over at The Guardian. DJ Cho’zyn Boy, who works for Marcus Gray and first detected the similarity, explained to The Guardian that the melodies sound “identical” when you change their tempos and bring Perry’s down one octave.
Plagiarism is frequently an issue in the music industry for obvious reasons. Most musicians start off by playing other artists’ music and as they develop, they end up borrowing from those who have gone before. Without this kind of borrowing, there would be no genres or traditions in the music industry.
Artists generally accept that all music includes patterns and formal sets of rules – particularly when working within the limited number of notes on the western musical scale. For this reason, accidental plagiarism is accepted as a legitimate possibility, a factor that makes it distinct from many other forms of plagiarism.
The problem comes into play when artists go past borrowing and into the territory of outright theft. Accidental plagiarism makes it very difficult to prove that an artist intentionally stole part of a song, and so U.S. copyright law requires that plaintiffs can prove “access” and “similarity”. Access means here that the defendant had heard the song at some point before creating his or her song and similarity means that both songs share unique musical components.
Joyful Noise was released to the public in 2008 on a Grammy-nominated album, and received a Dove Award nomination itself. While this doesn’t explicitly prove that Perry heard the song – she absolutely had access to it. The songs also share questionably similar musical components. Whether or not these components are unique is likely to be a major question in court.
A ruling for the plaintiffs would allow the previously little-known hip-hop group to see some or all of the proceeds for a song that remained in the No. 1 spot on the Billboard charts for weeks in January and which Perry has performed live numerous times.
See also, the other piece I wrote about Katy Perry regarding her latest lawsuit:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
NYC Real Estate and Litigation Attorney Ryan O. Miller and Team Join Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC New York City, NY – August 13, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has strengthened its Real Estate and Litigation practices with the addition of four New York City-based attorneys. Ryan Miller, who joins as a partner, is well known for […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!