
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: December 11, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comU.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross has questioned the reasoning for permitting Trump Entertainment to remain in Chapter 11.
When Trump Entertainment filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law, it intended to restructure and go on being profitable. Now that it seems this is less likely, Gross has ordered the company to demonstrate why its Chapter 11 reorganization bankruptcy shouldn’t be converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation, according to The Wall Street Journal. This would ruin the plans of billionaire Carl Icahn, who has wanted to take the company over via a debt for equity swap. In apparently questioning Icahn’s strategy, Judge Gross cited the lack of adequate financing for Trump’s successful emergence from Chapter 11.
Under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law, the court appoints a trustee to make decisions for the company and sell its assets. The proceeds are then distributed to creditors. By contrast, under a proposed Chapter 11 reorganization plan, Carl Icahn and associates could take full control of the company and inject $100 million into its operations, according to Bloomberg. This proposed investment by Icahn was however conditional on the company winning the right to terminate its collective bargaining agreement with its union, as well as the securement of over $100 million from the State of New Jersey. Trump Entertainment won its court battle with the union, but this decision has been appealed. Meanwhile, state officials have suggested that they will not donate taxpayer money to the casino.
Should Trump Entertainment’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy be converted into a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the company will lose the right to make decisions and business operations will cease. While secured debts, like those held by Icahn, will keep their top-level status, it is difficult to tell how much money would result from a liquidation or precisely how it would be allocated.
Trump Entertainment’s fall into bankruptcy has been well documented by this creditors’ rights and bankruptcy attorney. Checkout at the previous coverage to get the full story.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!