
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: June 18, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comJefferson County, Alabama, has announced the details of an agreement it reached with creditors that will enable the distressed county to formally exit municipal bankruptcy.
The county has agreed to refinance its existing debts by June 30 in an effort to officially emerge from bankruptcy law protection by November 2013. According to the terms of the agreement, Jefferson will pay its largest creditors, who include JPMorgan Chase, seven hedge funds, and a group of bond insurers, $1.84 billion, which represents 60 percent of the total balance it owes.
Collectively, the creditors hold $2.4 billion of Jefferson County’s debt, but JPMorgan holds the largest percentage at $1.22 billion, and has agreed to forgive $842 million of the balance. The bank will carry the most substantial losses after the bankruptcy has been completed, after giving up its rights to collect a total of $1.57 billion in debt following a separate 2009 settlement with the county.
The hedge funds – which are owed roughly $872 million – will collect more than 80 cents on the dollar under the terms of the deal. Lastly, the county will pay insurers roughly $165 million of the $315 debt balance owed, as well as $25 million to cover any claims filed against the insurers by creditors who aim to recover their losses.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Thomas Bennett agreed to the refinancing timeline, but the overall deal is still subject to court approval in November.
Although the county reached an agreement with its largest debt holders, it is still working to establish a plan to pay school warrant holders in full and strike a deal with general obligation debt holders, Bloomberg reports. In an effort build revenue and help repay its debt obligations, Jefferson County residents will see their sewage rates increase by 7.4 percent annually for a four-year period.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Owning a residential rental property in New Jersey involves more than finding tenants and collecting rent. Property owners must comply with a combination of state laws, municipal ordinances, building and housing codes, and zoning and land use regulations. These requirements can affect everything from the number of dwelling units permitted at a property to whether […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!