Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 21, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comSecurity-based swaps, a popular derivative, pose problems for regulators because the market involves counterparties located in different countries across the globe. The proposed rules are intended to bring greater certainty to the market by clarifying which securities regulatory requirements apply when a transaction occurs in part within and in part outside the United States.
The difficulty with finalizing the proposed rules is that each agency is authorized to oversee parts of the swaps industry. Moreover, the SEC and CFTC rules proposals take vastly different approaches to a number of key issues. For instance, the SEC’s proposal provides for a broader “substituted compliance” — in certain circumstances, market participants may comply with foreign regulatory requirements in substitution for Title VII requirements — than the CFTC proposal.
Further muddying the waters, the U.S. House of Representatives recently passed legislation that would require the two agencies to issue one set of uniform rules for cross-border swaps. The Swap Jurisdiction Certainty Act (H.R. 1256) passed by a vote of 301 to 124. The Act also mandates that non-U.S. persons that are in compliance with the swap requirements of a country or administration region that has one of the nine largest swaps markets would be exempt from the new requirements under certain conditions.
Supporters of the Swap Jurisdiction Certainty Act argue that domestic and global swaps regulations need to be coherent and complementary. Meanwhile, critics contend that the legislation is intended to derail the mandates of the Dodd-Frank Act. While the U.S. Senate is not expected to consider a similar bill, the House legislation sends a strong message that the agencies may have to engage in a more collaborative approach. Businesses that may be impacted by the proposed regulations are advised to monitor the legal developments and check back here for updates.
If you have any questions about the cross-border swap proposals or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Kenneth Oh, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!