Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Is Cross-Border Swaps Regulation at a Standstill?

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: June 21, 2013

Key Contacts

Back

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have both proposed rules to govern cross-border security-based swap activities, as mandated under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act. However, implementation is unlikely any time soon.

Security-based swaps, a popular derivative, pose problems for regulators because the market involves counterparties located in different countries across the globe. The proposed rules are intended to bring greater certainty to the market by clarifying which securities regulatory requirements apply when a transaction occurs in part within and in part outside the United States.

The difficulty with finalizing the proposed rules is that each agency is authorized to oversee parts of the swaps industry. Moreover, the SEC and CFTC rules proposals take vastly different approaches to a number of key issues. For instance, the SEC’s proposal provides for a broader “substituted compliance” — in certain circumstances,  market participants may comply with foreign regulatory requirements in substitution for Title VII requirements — than the CFTC proposal.

Further muddying the waters, the U.S. House of Representatives recently passed legislation that would require the two agencies to issue one set of uniform rules for cross-border swaps. The Swap Jurisdiction Certainty Act (H.R. 1256) passed by a vote of 301 to 124.  The Act also mandates that non-U.S. persons  that are in compliance with the swap requirements of a country or administration region that has one of the nine largest swaps markets would be exempt from the new requirements under certain conditions.

Supporters of the Swap Jurisdiction Certainty Act argue that domestic and global swaps regulations need to be coherent and complementary. Meanwhile, critics contend that the legislation is intended to derail the mandates of the Dodd-Frank Act. While the U.S. Senate is not expected to consider a similar bill, the House legislation sends a strong message that the agencies may have to engage in a more collaborative approach. Businesses that may be impacted by the proposed regulations are advised to monitor the legal developments and check back here for updates.

If you have any questions about the cross-border swap proposals or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Kenneth Oh, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce post image

How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]

Author: Jay McDaniel

Link to post with title - "How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce"
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes post image

10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]

Author: Paul Grossman

Link to post with title - "10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes"
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together post image

Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together"
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York post image

Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]

Author: Donald M. Pepe

Link to post with title - "Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York"
Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect post image

Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect

A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences.  It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]

Author: Jay McDaniel

Link to post with title - "Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect"
The Legal Implications of Signing a Triple Net Lease post image

The Legal Implications of Signing a Triple Net Lease

A triple net lease is a commercial lease in which the tenant pays the property’s real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, known as the three nets, in addition to base rent. They are most often used in freestanding retail and office buildings and in large single-tenant industrial properties, with terms that typically run 10 […]

Author: Donald M. Pepe

Link to post with title - "The Legal Implications of Signing a Triple Net Lease"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!