
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: June 5, 2014
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has announced that it will revise, without holding a public hearing, the proposed rules governing nonprofit groups’ involvement in politics. The rules, released last year, attempted to provide guidance for the political activity groups organized under section 501(c)(4) of the U.S. tax code could take without risking the loss of their tax exempt status or being required to disclose their donors. The 501(c)(4) groups have played a significant role in U.S. elections, spending more than $250 million on the 2012 election.
The tax laws provide that 501(c)(4) groups must be organized “exclusively” to promote social welfare, while the IRS regulations say social welfare must be their “primary” focus. This has led to conflicts over how to measure politics and primary purpose.
The regulations stemmed from the Tea Party controversy that occurred last summer. The IRS revealed that it exerted extra scrutiny of certain Tea Party groups seeking tax-exempt status, based on a serious of factors, including their names as well as actual conduct of political activity by other groups already qualified under (c)(4) and the description of the applicant’s activities under pending applications. As a result, the rules were created to provide guidelines for IRS employees in determining what activities were considered political involvement that would result in a group losing its tax-exempt status.
After the IRS released the new rules, it received in excess of 150,000 comments and objections to their breadth and violation of free speech rights. Many called for the IRS to start over, but the IRS’s recent announcement indicated they believe it will be more efficient to not hold public hearings until after the revised rules have been published. The IRS’s statement did not specify how extensive the revisions will be or when the new rules are expected to be released, but it has been speculated that the process will not be completed in 2014.
If you have any questions about the issues discussed above or would like to discuss other tax law matters, please contact me or a member of the award-winning Scarinci Hollenbeck Tax Practice Group. You can also find additional posts regarding the special tax concerns facing businesses on our blog, Tax, Trust, and Estate News.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has announced that it will revise, without holding a public hearing, the proposed rules governing nonprofit groups’ involvement in politics. The rules, released last year, attempted to provide guidance for the political activity groups organized under section 501(c)(4) of the U.S. tax code could take without risking the loss of their tax exempt status or being required to disclose their donors. The 501(c)(4) groups have played a significant role in U.S. elections, spending more than $250 million on the 2012 election.
The tax laws provide that 501(c)(4) groups must be organized “exclusively” to promote social welfare, while the IRS regulations say social welfare must be their “primary” focus. This has led to conflicts over how to measure politics and primary purpose.
The regulations stemmed from the Tea Party controversy that occurred last summer. The IRS revealed that it exerted extra scrutiny of certain Tea Party groups seeking tax-exempt status, based on a serious of factors, including their names as well as actual conduct of political activity by other groups already qualified under (c)(4) and the description of the applicant’s activities under pending applications. As a result, the rules were created to provide guidelines for IRS employees in determining what activities were considered political involvement that would result in a group losing its tax-exempt status.
After the IRS released the new rules, it received in excess of 150,000 comments and objections to their breadth and violation of free speech rights. Many called for the IRS to start over, but the IRS’s recent announcement indicated they believe it will be more efficient to not hold public hearings until after the revised rules have been published. The IRS’s statement did not specify how extensive the revisions will be or when the new rules are expected to be released, but it has been speculated that the process will not be completed in 2014.
If you have any questions about the issues discussed above or would like to discuss other tax law matters, please contact me or a member of the award-winning Scarinci Hollenbeck Tax Practice Group. You can also find additional posts regarding the special tax concerns facing businesses on our blog, Tax, Trust, and Estate News.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!