Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 23, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe IRS updated its list of “Bad Banks” last month, which is now up to 95 banking institutions. This list will continue to grow as Swiss banks and foreign financial institutions come under more intense scrutiny from the Department of Justice to force public disclosure. So if your client’s bank is on the list, he or she should be made aware that the current Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program penalty is now 50 percent. It is vital to disclose all necessary information before it is too late.

The IRS increased the offshore disclosure penalty percentage from 27.5 percent to 50 percent last year, according to Professor Frank L. Brunetti’s Tax News blog. What this meant was that taxpayers could avoid the 50 percent offshore disclosure penalty if they submit a pre-clearance letter to the IRS before a financial institution came under investigation for public disclosure. But the penalties for not submitting this pre-clearance letter before a public disclosure are strict.
For instance, let’s say your client has assets in a foreign bank account valued at $3 million and an additional $4 million in offshore real estate purchased with the assets from that offshore account. That $7 million would be subject to a 50 percent penalty, which would be $3.5 million. This is significant because the previous 27.5 percent would have still been a substantial amount, but only $1,925,000. So your client would be required to pay an additional $1,575,000. No small chunk of change. Especially when you consider that there is also the risk that during the investigation your client could lose the OVDP criminal amnesty – all because you client did not submit a pre-clearance letter.
Certainly it is no secret that Swiss banks figure prominently in the top 10 on the IRS list of “Bad Banks” and this is partly due to the settlement reached between the Department of Justice and the Swiss banking system in 2014. This settlement led to the public disclosure of more than 300 U.S. account holders with more than $2 trillion in assets within the Swiss banking system. Needless to say, the Swiss are expected to continue to be a target of the IRS and the Department of Justice in the coming years.
One thing your client needs to consider is that the IRS will not accept ignorance as a plea anymore, regardless of where your client owes taxes on those assets. In addition, if you yourself have come to find that your bank is on this “Bad Banks” list, consult an experienced tax attorney for advice.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

A triple net lease is a commercial lease in which the tenant pays the property’s real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, known as the three nets, in addition to base rent. They are most often used in freestanding retail and office buildings and in large single-tenant industrial properties, with terms that typically run 10 […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!