Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 21, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn late July, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed two bills into law that will impose new privacy requirements on New York businesses. The “Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security” (SHIELD) Act imposes new obligations regarding how businesses handle private customer data and provide data breach notifications. The second bill (A.2374/S.3582) requires consumer credit reporting agencies to offer identity theft prevention and mitigation services in the case of a breach.

Key points of the SHIELD Act include: (a) broadening the scope of information covered under breach notification law, (b) broadening the definition of a data breach to include unauthorized access to information (not just the unauthorized acquisition of information), and (c) requiring businesses to provide reasonable data security.
The SHIELD requirements apply to “any person or business that owns or licenses computerized data which includes private information of a resident of New York.” Such people/businesses are required to “develop, implement and maintain reasonable safeguards to protect the security, confidentiality and integrity of the private information including, but not limited to, disposal of data.” SHIELD will take effect in March 2020.
Two carve-outs for certain businesses:
SHIELD broadens the scope of information covered under New York’s existing data breach notification law, and updates notification requirements when there has been a breach of data. Three key changes include:
Failure to provide required reasonable data security would be a violation of section 349 of the General Business Law, and the attorney general could bring suit for noncompliance. Businesses could be fined $5,000 for each violation or up to $20 per instance of failed notification, with an aggregate maximum of $250,000. However, the SHIELD Act does not create a private right of action.
The second bill impacts credit reporting agencies and establishes the minimal amount of long-term protections that must be given to affected consumers. For any credit reporting agency that suffers a breach of information containing consumer Social Security numbers, that agency must then provide to affected consumers five years of identity theft prevention services and, if applicable, identity theft mitigation services. Credit reporting agencies must also inform consumers on credit freezes of a breach of data involving a Social Security number, and provide consumers with the right to freeze their credit at no cost. This law will take effect in September 2019 and applies to any breach of the security of a consumer credit reporting agency that occurred in the prior three years.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Kristin Garris, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!