Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 21, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comGiven our increasingly global economy, even small businesses should consider international trademark protection. Failing to protect your brand when conducting business overseas can lead to costly legal disputes.When a business registers a trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the legal rights are limited to the United States. Thankfully, it is becoming easier to extend trademark rights to other countries around the world.
Defensive registration is extremely important with respect to trademarks, particularly because many countries give priority to the first to file. Under “first to file” systems, trademark rights are generally bestowed on the first entity to file an application. With this in mind, there is incentive for brand counterfeiters and hijackers to pursue trademark rights ahead of U.S. companies.
“When a business registers a trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the legal rights are limited to the United States.”
In countries like China, for example, major brands have been forced to buy back a registration, which can be extremely expensive and time consuming. Given the potential legal headaches, businesses should identify key international markets and then begin the process of obtaining trademark protection as soon as possible.
Once your business has identified the key markets where trademark protection is needed, it’s time to do some research. To start, it is imperative to verify that another entity is not already using an identical or confusingly similar mark.
“Businesses should be sure to assess how well their brand names and slogans will translate into other languages.”
In some cases, a perfectly acceptable English term or image may be vulgar or otherwise offensive in another language.
The Madrid system makes it possible to register a mark in several territories through one procedure. The system is administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and governed by two international treaties, the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol.
For trademark owners, the Madrid system provides several key advantages.
It allows trademark owners to file one single application to secure trademark protection in more than 100 different countries. Accordingly, it also avoids the need to comply with different national procedural rules, translate applications, retain local agents, and pay several different fees. Upon receipt of the trademark application, WIPO notifies all of the Madrid Protocol countries in which registration is sought. If the member country fails to object within twelve to eighteen months of being notified, the trademark is registered.
Renewal is also more manageable under the Madrid system. The required fees need only be paid every 10 years to the International Bureau of WIPO rather than several national trademark offices. Additionally, if the international registration is assigned to a third party or a change in name and/or address occurs, it only needs to be recorded once with the WIPO.
While the Madrid system offers many advantages, trademark owners utilizing the Madrid Protocol must be cognizant of their trademark rights. The rights granted by an international registration can be extinguished if the home national application in which the international registration is based on does not mature to registration if the international registration’s home national registration is cancelled during its first five years.This concept is called a “central attack.” If either of these situations were to occur, trademark owners may opt to transform an international registration into national applications in each of the contracting parties in which the international registration had effect, which would allow for the preservation of the priority date of the international registration.
Are you still unsure about international trademark protection? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Adrian Lee, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!