Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Insider-Trading Streak Ends With Rajaratnam Acquittal
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: July 17, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Rengan Rajaratnam will not suffer the same fate as his younger brother, Galleon Group founder Raj Rajaratnam. A federal jury recently cleared him of insider- trading charges.
The trial loss brings U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s five-year winning streak to an end. He was 81-0 in securing insider-trading convictions over the past four years. Bharara’s high-profile victories include Raj Rajaratnam, former Goldman Sachs director,McKinsey managing director Rajat Gupta, and SAC Capital’s Mathew Martoma.
In many ways, the most recent Rajaratnam case was doomed from the start. The only charge that made it to the jury was conspiracy to engage in insider trading. Rengan Rajaratnam initially faced six counts of securities fraud. However, prosecutors dropped four of the charges prior to trial, and the judge dismissed the remaining fraud charges at the close of the government’s case..
While acquitted of criminal insider-trading charges, Rajaratnam still faces an enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). However, the agency is having insider-trading troubles of its own.
Earlier this year, the SEC suffered a much-publicized trial loss in its case against Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban. The agency alleged that Cuban sold his shares in Momma.com soon after being told by the company’s CEO that his shares would be diluted through a stock offering. However, the jury ultimately concluded that prosecutors failed to prove that Cuban violated any duty not to trade on the information. More recently, juries also found in favor of defendants in two additional insider trading cases brought by the agency.
The recent trial losses suggest that both the SEC and federal prosecutors may be overreaching in their zest to crackdown on insider trading. While both have been successful in the past, insider-trading cases are difficult to prove, particularly given the frequent need to rely on circumstantial evidence and the recent Second Circuit ruling that requires proof of knowledge by the person purportedly trading on inside information that the informer benefitted from the disclosure (see my July 8, 2014 blog “Will There Be a New Loophole for Insider Trading.”) One can expect defendants hereafter to gear up and focus their defense on the tipper’s lack of benefit, where the facts allow. In any event, it appears that, as a result of these recent developments, future defendants in insider trading cases may seek better terms in plea bargaining or elect to take their chances in the courtroom.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss insider-trading violations, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Insider-Trading Streak Ends With Rajaratnam Acquittal
Author: Dan Brecher
Rengan Rajaratnam will not suffer the same fate as his younger brother, Galleon Group founder Raj Rajaratnam. A federal jury recently cleared him of insider- trading charges.
The trial loss brings U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s five-year winning streak to an end. He was 81-0 in securing insider-trading convictions over the past four years. Bharara’s high-profile victories include Raj Rajaratnam, former Goldman Sachs director,McKinsey managing director Rajat Gupta, and SAC Capital’s Mathew Martoma.
In many ways, the most recent Rajaratnam case was doomed from the start. The only charge that made it to the jury was conspiracy to engage in insider trading. Rengan Rajaratnam initially faced six counts of securities fraud. However, prosecutors dropped four of the charges prior to trial, and the judge dismissed the remaining fraud charges at the close of the government’s case..
While acquitted of criminal insider-trading charges, Rajaratnam still faces an enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). However, the agency is having insider-trading troubles of its own.
Earlier this year, the SEC suffered a much-publicized trial loss in its case against Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban. The agency alleged that Cuban sold his shares in Momma.com soon after being told by the company’s CEO that his shares would be diluted through a stock offering. However, the jury ultimately concluded that prosecutors failed to prove that Cuban violated any duty not to trade on the information. More recently, juries also found in favor of defendants in two additional insider trading cases brought by the agency.
The recent trial losses suggest that both the SEC and federal prosecutors may be overreaching in their zest to crackdown on insider trading. While both have been successful in the past, insider-trading cases are difficult to prove, particularly given the frequent need to rely on circumstantial evidence and the recent Second Circuit ruling that requires proof of knowledge by the person purportedly trading on inside information that the informer benefitted from the disclosure (see my July 8, 2014 blog “Will There Be a New Loophole for Insider Trading.”) One can expect defendants hereafter to gear up and focus their defense on the tipper’s lack of benefit, where the facts allow. In any event, it appears that, as a result of these recent developments, future defendants in insider trading cases may seek better terms in plea bargaining or elect to take their chances in the courtroom.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss insider-trading violations, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.