Congress is hoping that tax revenue from cryptocurrency transactions will help fund infrastructure projects across the country...
Congress is hoping that tax revenue from cryptocurrency transactions will help fund infrastructure projects across the country. Under a controversial provision in the $1 trillion infrastructure bill approved by the U.S. Senate, cryptocurrency brokers will be subject to new tax-reporting requirements.
Increasing Oversight Over Cryptocurrency
As discussed in prior posts, the federal government is steadily increasing its oversight over cryptocurrency as it grows in popularity. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has led the charge, seeking to increase tax compliance around cryptocurrency transactions. In 2019, the IRS began sending letters to taxpayers with virtual currency transactions that potentially failed to report income and pay the resulting tax from virtual currency transactions or did not report their transactions properly.
In 2020, the IRS added a new section to Form 1040 that asks taxpayers to report capital gains and losses from crypto transactions. Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Treasury released a report outlining the Biden Administration’s proposed tax compliance measures, which includes the requirement that crypto transactions exceeding $10,000 be reported to the IRS.
Cryptocurrency Provisions in Infrastructure Bill
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684) seeks to increase the reporting of cryptocurrency transactions to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a move that is projected to raise $27.9 billion over the next ten years. The bill would specifically require cryptocurrency “brokers” to collect certain information from cryptocurrency account owners, such as their names, addresses, and tax identification numbers. Brokers would also be required to provide certain information to the IRS regarding a client’s sale of cryptocurrency, including identifying information about the seller and the amount recognized from the sale.
The proposed legislation is generating controversy because it expands the definition of “broker” under the U.S. Tax Code to include “any person who (for consideration) is responsible for regularly providing any service effectuating transfers of digital assets on behalf of another person.” While the definition is intended to capture cryptocurrency exchanges and other entities that facilitate cryptocurrency sales or transfers, the cryptocurrency industry has raised concerns that the broad definition will also sweep up cryptocurrency miners, software developers, and others who don’t have visibility to buyers and sellers.
While several amendments were proposed in the Senate, lawmakers were unable to reach a consensus on substitute language. As a result, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act passed with the controversial cryptocurrency provision intact.
Should those efforts be unsuccessful, the U.S. Treasury will still have the opportunity to clarify the reporting requirements when enacting implementing regulations. As currently written, the new requirement wouldn’t take effect until 2024, which leaves a lot of time to solicit feedback and fine-tune the “broker” definition.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Teddy Eynon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
How Will the Infrastructure Bill Impact Cryptocurrency?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Congress is hoping that tax revenue from cryptocurrency transactions will help fund infrastructure projects across the country...
Congress is hoping that tax revenue from cryptocurrency transactions will help fund infrastructure projects across the country. Under a controversial provision in the $1 trillion infrastructure bill approved by the U.S. Senate, cryptocurrency brokers will be subject to new tax-reporting requirements.
Increasing Oversight Over Cryptocurrency
As discussed in prior posts, the federal government is steadily increasing its oversight over cryptocurrency as it grows in popularity. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has led the charge, seeking to increase tax compliance around cryptocurrency transactions. In 2019, the IRS began sending letters to taxpayers with virtual currency transactions that potentially failed to report income and pay the resulting tax from virtual currency transactions or did not report their transactions properly.
In 2020, the IRS added a new section to Form 1040 that asks taxpayers to report capital gains and losses from crypto transactions. Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Treasury released a report outlining the Biden Administration’s proposed tax compliance measures, which includes the requirement that crypto transactions exceeding $10,000 be reported to the IRS.
Cryptocurrency Provisions in Infrastructure Bill
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684) seeks to increase the reporting of cryptocurrency transactions to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a move that is projected to raise $27.9 billion over the next ten years. The bill would specifically require cryptocurrency “brokers” to collect certain information from cryptocurrency account owners, such as their names, addresses, and tax identification numbers. Brokers would also be required to provide certain information to the IRS regarding a client’s sale of cryptocurrency, including identifying information about the seller and the amount recognized from the sale.
The proposed legislation is generating controversy because it expands the definition of “broker” under the U.S. Tax Code to include “any person who (for consideration) is responsible for regularly providing any service effectuating transfers of digital assets on behalf of another person.” While the definition is intended to capture cryptocurrency exchanges and other entities that facilitate cryptocurrency sales or transfers, the cryptocurrency industry has raised concerns that the broad definition will also sweep up cryptocurrency miners, software developers, and others who don’t have visibility to buyers and sellers.
While several amendments were proposed in the Senate, lawmakers were unable to reach a consensus on substitute language. As a result, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act passed with the controversial cryptocurrency provision intact.
Should those efforts be unsuccessful, the U.S. Treasury will still have the opportunity to clarify the reporting requirements when enacting implementing regulations. As currently written, the new requirement wouldn’t take effect until 2024, which leaves a lot of time to solicit feedback and fine-tune the “broker” definition.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Teddy Eynon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
