James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IMF: Japan May Be Unable To Afford Its Corporate Tax Cuts
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 28, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
In an International Monetary Fund Working Paper published recently, Ruud De Mooij and Ikuo Saito discussed the effects of the Japanese government’s upcoming corporate tax cut. The current Japanese tax on corporate income is 35 percent – on par with the American tax. After the cut, Japan’s rate will be reduced to 30 percent, leaving America’s corporate income tax as one of the highest in the developed world.
The IMF’s annual Article IV consultation with Japan noted the need for the country to lay out a concrete, medium-term plan to reduce its debt, according to Tax-News. Even if another consumption tax increase were to be implemented in 2015, Japan’s gross debt-to-GDP ratio would remain over 240 percent. The IMF concurred with Japan that a cut in the corporate tax rate could lift investment and economic growth in the consultation, but cautioned that this cut would not be self-financing. The Fund concluded that Japan should only proceed with such a measure if other measures were taken to offset the resultant revenue loss.
In the IMF working paper and an accompanying blog post on iMFdirect, de Mooij and Saito explained that there is actually limited room for expansion of the Japanese corporate income tax base.
Why should we care? A growing number of American politicians and corporations are calling for a reduction in the U.S. tax code that is at least equal to, if not greater than, the one the Japanese are implementing. In many of these arguments, the work of Arthur Laffer is referenced, specifically “Laffer curves.” In this context, the reference is to the idea that a sufficiently high tax rate actually reduces revenues because of its extreme distortionary effects.
Some proponents of the corporate income tax cut in Japan have also referenced Laffer, suggesting that a reduction in the tax rate would lead to a sufficient expansion in the Japanese base that revenues will ultimately increase without the need for offsetting measures, according to de Mooij and Saito. While the U.S. is lucky to have the chance to watch a similar reduction in the tax code go into effect, the IMF writers caution in their Working Paper that empirical literature on corporate tax elasticities suggest that there will be a far more modest effect on the base.
As a corporate tax attorneys, Frank L. Brunetti and I often write about topics such as international tax trends, corporate tax cuts, corporate income tax, and corporate inversions. If you want to learn more about these areas of tax, trusts, and estates take a look at some of our previous posts:
- 20 profitable U.S. companies Paid No Corporate Income Tax Last Quarter
- NY Budget Ends Corporate Income Tax For Manufacturers
- REITs & The Corporate Tax Base
- What Corporate Inversions Are Telling Us (And What Washington Refuses To Hear)
- International Tax Trends
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
IMF: Japan May Be Unable To Afford Its Corporate Tax Cuts
Author: James F. McDonough
In an International Monetary Fund Working Paper published recently, Ruud De Mooij and Ikuo Saito discussed the effects of the Japanese government’s upcoming corporate tax cut. The current Japanese tax on corporate income is 35 percent – on par with the American tax. After the cut, Japan’s rate will be reduced to 30 percent, leaving America’s corporate income tax as one of the highest in the developed world.
The IMF’s annual Article IV consultation with Japan noted the need for the country to lay out a concrete, medium-term plan to reduce its debt, according to Tax-News. Even if another consumption tax increase were to be implemented in 2015, Japan’s gross debt-to-GDP ratio would remain over 240 percent. The IMF concurred with Japan that a cut in the corporate tax rate could lift investment and economic growth in the consultation, but cautioned that this cut would not be self-financing. The Fund concluded that Japan should only proceed with such a measure if other measures were taken to offset the resultant revenue loss.
In the IMF working paper and an accompanying blog post on iMFdirect, de Mooij and Saito explained that there is actually limited room for expansion of the Japanese corporate income tax base.
Why should we care? A growing number of American politicians and corporations are calling for a reduction in the U.S. tax code that is at least equal to, if not greater than, the one the Japanese are implementing. In many of these arguments, the work of Arthur Laffer is referenced, specifically “Laffer curves.” In this context, the reference is to the idea that a sufficiently high tax rate actually reduces revenues because of its extreme distortionary effects.
Some proponents of the corporate income tax cut in Japan have also referenced Laffer, suggesting that a reduction in the tax rate would lead to a sufficient expansion in the Japanese base that revenues will ultimately increase without the need for offsetting measures, according to de Mooij and Saito. While the U.S. is lucky to have the chance to watch a similar reduction in the tax code go into effect, the IMF writers caution in their Working Paper that empirical literature on corporate tax elasticities suggest that there will be a far more modest effect on the base.
As a corporate tax attorneys, Frank L. Brunetti and I often write about topics such as international tax trends, corporate tax cuts, corporate income tax, and corporate inversions. If you want to learn more about these areas of tax, trusts, and estates take a look at some of our previous posts:
- 20 profitable U.S. companies Paid No Corporate Income Tax Last Quarter
- NY Budget Ends Corporate Income Tax For Manufacturers
- REITs & The Corporate Tax Base
- What Corporate Inversions Are Telling Us (And What Washington Refuses To Hear)
- International Tax Trends