Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Fun & Games with Mortgage Bankruptcy

Author: Joel R. Glucksman

Date: June 11, 2015

Key Contacts

Back

Dewsnup v. Timm

In 1992, the United States Supreme Court decided a mortgage bankruptcy case entitled, Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992).  This held that a debtor in a bankruptcy could not use a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding to “strip down” a mortgage lien to the value of the collateral.

In Dewsnup, the mortgage was for a greater amount than the value of the property.  The debtor attempted to use bankruptcy to reduce the value of the mortgage to the value of the property, and to discharge the “undersecured” remainder of the mortgage debt.  The Supreme Court refused to allow that, thus leaving the debtor in the position of either walking away from the property (that is, abandoning it in the bankruptcy), or agreeing to pay the mortgage bank the full amount of the mortgage.

Applying the Dewsnup Ruling

Despite frequent criticism of Dewsnup’s reasoning, the Supreme Court has just reaffirmed it.  In last week’s case of Bank of America v. Caulkett, the debtors both had second mortgages which were completely “under water.”  That is, the values of the two properties were each less than the first mortgages, leaving the second mortgages fully unsecured.  The Supreme Court, being consistent, followed Dewsnup, and declared that not even completely unsecured mortgages could be “stripped down” in bankruptcy.

The interesting point, however, was that the opinion, a unanimous ruling authored by Justice Thomas, admitted in a footnote that Dewsnup “has been the target of criticism.”  Indeed, Justice Thomas cited to Justice Scalia’s dissent in Dewsnup.  One might therefore have expected the Supreme Court to consider overruling Dewsnup.  Thomas chose not to do this, relying repeatedly on the fact that counsel in Caulkett never asked that Dewsnup be reconsidered.  One will note, charitably, for the record, that this omission has not stopped the High Court in the past from targeting issues.  Perhaps they are simply laying the ground work for an all-out assault on Dewsnup.

If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter in more detail, please contact Joel Glucksman, Partner, Chair, Bankruptcy & Creditors Rights Group.

Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy?  Have you been sued by a bankrupt?  If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now post image

A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now"
Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses post image

Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]

Author: John D. Giampolo

Link to post with title - "Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses"
Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know post image

Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]

Author: George McGowan

Link to post with title - "Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know"
Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law post image

Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law"
The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions post image

The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]

Author: George McGowan

Link to post with title - "The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions"
You Just Received a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena in New Jersey: Now What? post image

You Just Received a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena in New Jersey: Now What?

Receiving a federal grand jury subpoena is not something most businesses or individuals anticipate. While it can be concerning, a federal grand jury subpoena does not necessarily mean that you are being accused of wrongdoing. It does, however, mean that a federal criminal investigation is underway and that federal prosecutors believe you may possess information […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "You Just Received a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena in New Jersey: Now What?"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!