Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Fun & Games with Mortgage Bankruptcy

Author: Joel R. Glucksman

Date: June 11, 2015

Key Contacts

Back

Dewsnup v. Timm

In 1992, the United States Supreme Court decided a mortgage bankruptcy case entitled, Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992).  This held that a debtor in a bankruptcy could not use a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding to “strip down” a mortgage lien to the value of the collateral.

In Dewsnup, the mortgage was for a greater amount than the value of the property.  The debtor attempted to use bankruptcy to reduce the value of the mortgage to the value of the property, and to discharge the “undersecured” remainder of the mortgage debt.  The Supreme Court refused to allow that, thus leaving the debtor in the position of either walking away from the property (that is, abandoning it in the bankruptcy), or agreeing to pay the mortgage bank the full amount of the mortgage.

Applying the Dewsnup Ruling

Despite frequent criticism of Dewsnup’s reasoning, the Supreme Court has just reaffirmed it.  In last week’s case of Bank of America v. Caulkett, the debtors both had second mortgages which were completely “under water.”  That is, the values of the two properties were each less than the first mortgages, leaving the second mortgages fully unsecured.  The Supreme Court, being consistent, followed Dewsnup, and declared that not even completely unsecured mortgages could be “stripped down” in bankruptcy.

The interesting point, however, was that the opinion, a unanimous ruling authored by Justice Thomas, admitted in a footnote that Dewsnup “has been the target of criticism.”  Indeed, Justice Thomas cited to Justice Scalia’s dissent in Dewsnup.  One might therefore have expected the Supreme Court to consider overruling Dewsnup.  Thomas chose not to do this, relying repeatedly on the fact that counsel in Caulkett never asked that Dewsnup be reconsidered.  One will note, charitably, for the record, that this omission has not stopped the High Court in the past from targeting issues.  Perhaps they are simply laying the ground work for an all-out assault on Dewsnup.

If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter in more detail, please contact Joel Glucksman, Partner, Chair, Bankruptcy & Creditors Rights Group.

Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy?  Have you been sued by a bankrupt?  If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities post image

The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities"
Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make post image

Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make"
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits post image

What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits"
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies post image

Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]

Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Link to post with title - "Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies"
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights post image

What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]

Author: Robert E. Levy

Link to post with title - "What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights"
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities post image

Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!