Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
Dewsnup v. Timm
In 1992, the United States Supreme Court decided a mortgage bankruptcy case entitled, Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992). This held that a debtor in a bankruptcy could not use a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding to “strip down” a mortgage lien to the value of the collateral.
In Dewsnup, the mortgage was for a greater amount than the value of the property. The debtor attempted to use bankruptcy to reduce the value of the mortgage to the value of the property, and to discharge the “undersecured” remainder of the mortgage debt. The Supreme Court refused to allow that, thus leaving the debtor in the position of either walking away from the property (that is, abandoning it in the bankruptcy), or agreeing to pay the mortgage bank the full amount of the mortgage.
Applying the Dewsnup Ruling
Despite frequent criticism of Dewsnup’s reasoning, the Supreme Court has just reaffirmed it. In last week’s case of Bank of America v. Caulkett, the debtors both had second mortgages which were completely “under water.” That is, the values of the two properties were each less than the first mortgages, leaving the second mortgages fully unsecured. The Supreme Court, being consistent, followed Dewsnup, and declared that not even completely unsecured mortgages could be “stripped down” in bankruptcy.
The interesting point, however, was that the opinion, a unanimous ruling authored by Justice Thomas, admitted in a footnote that Dewsnup “has been the target of criticism.” Indeed, Justice Thomas cited to Justice Scalia’s dissent in Dewsnup. One might therefore have expected the Supreme Court to consider overruling Dewsnup. Thomas chose not to do this, relying repeatedly on the fact that counsel in Caulkett never asked that Dewsnup be reconsidered. One will note, charitably, for the record, that this omission has not stopped the High Court in the past from targeting issues. Perhaps they are simply laying the ground work for an all-out assault on Dewsnup.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter in more detail, please contact Joel Glucksman, Partner, Chair, Bankruptcy & Creditors Rights Group.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Corporate Consolidation and Antitrust Issues in Mergers
Corporate consolidation involves two or more businesses merging to become a single larger entity. The result is often a stronger and more competitive company that can better navigate today’s competitive marketplace. What Is Corporate Consolidation? Corporate consolidation closely resembles a basic merger transaction. The primary difference is that a consolidation creates an entirely new business […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is Business Law and Why Is it Important?
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Transactions: Best Practices for Successful Deals
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
How to Conduct a Fair and Legal Employee Termination in 2025
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
Admin Dissolution for Annual Report: What You Need to Know
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is Antitrust Litigation Law?
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.