
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comIn 1992, the United States Supreme Court decided a mortgage bankruptcy case entitled, Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992). This held that a debtor in a bankruptcy could not use a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding to “strip down” a mortgage lien to the value of the collateral.
In Dewsnup, the mortgage was for a greater amount than the value of the property. The debtor attempted to use bankruptcy to reduce the value of the mortgage to the value of the property, and to discharge the “undersecured” remainder of the mortgage debt. The Supreme Court refused to allow that, thus leaving the debtor in the position of either walking away from the property (that is, abandoning it in the bankruptcy), or agreeing to pay the mortgage bank the full amount of the mortgage.
Despite frequent criticism of Dewsnup’s reasoning, the Supreme Court has just reaffirmed it. In last week’s case of Bank of America v. Caulkett, the debtors both had second mortgages which were completely “under water.” That is, the values of the two properties were each less than the first mortgages, leaving the second mortgages fully unsecured. The Supreme Court, being consistent, followed Dewsnup, and declared that not even completely unsecured mortgages could be “stripped down” in bankruptcy.
The interesting point, however, was that the opinion, a unanimous ruling authored by Justice Thomas, admitted in a footnote that Dewsnup “has been the target of criticism.” Indeed, Justice Thomas cited to Justice Scalia’s dissent in Dewsnup. One might therefore have expected the Supreme Court to consider overruling Dewsnup. Thomas chose not to do this, relying repeatedly on the fact that counsel in Caulkett never asked that Dewsnup be reconsidered. One will note, charitably, for the record, that this omission has not stopped the High Court in the past from targeting issues. Perhaps they are simply laying the ground work for an all-out assault on Dewsnup.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter in more detail, please contact Joel Glucksman, Partner, Chair, Bankruptcy & Creditors Rights Group.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!