The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to consider another key business case. Atlantic Marine Construction Company v. J-Crew Management involves whether federal courts should be required to enforce a forum-selection clause in business contracts.
The specific issue before the Court is what happens when one party files a lawsuit in a venue other than as contractually agreed by the parties in the forum-selection clause. In the current lawsuit, the contract between J-Crew Management and Atlantic Marine Construction Company required disputes to be resolved in the state or federal court in Norfolk, Virginia. When J-Crew ignored such requirement by filing suit in Texas, Atlantic Marine sought to dismiss or transfer the lawsuit.
Federal courts have reached divergent opinions on what venue statute should apply to such motions. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), if a lawsuit is filed in the incorrect venue, the district court must dismiss it or transfer it to a proper venue. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), if the lawsuit is filed in a proper venue, the court may transfer it to another proper venue “[f]or the convenience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice.”
In a split decision, the Fifth Circuit ruled against Atlantic Marine. It interpreted the Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart Organization Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. to require that courts rely on 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) to decide a motion to transfer to another federal court based on a forum-selection clause. It further held that “private parties should not have the power to transcend federal venue statutes that have been duly enacted by Congress and render venue improper in a district where it otherwise would be proper under congressional legislation.”
While the majority of federal circuit courts have granted motions to enforce valid forum-selection clauses, the Third, Sixth and Seventh circuits also favor the Fifth Circuit’s approach. This divergence of approach and opinion has created considerable uncertainty for the courts and contract parties with sufficient bargaining power to determine the venue for dispute resolution. Accordingly, the justices have been asked to address and resolve this rift among the circuits.
The case will be considered in the October 2013 term. Please stay tuned for updates.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Gary Young, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
