
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 6, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comA one-time ‘king of foreclosures’ and his adult son were arrested in Pewaukee, Wisconsin, early on Oct. 20. The door to Todd Brunner’s home was broken in by heavily armed federal agents, before he and his 24-year-old son were taken into custody by U.S. marshals assisted by the FBI, Waukesha County Sheriff’s deputies and Pewaukee police, according to the Star Tribune. The pair have been indicted on charges related to bankruptcy fraud.
Brunner built a real estate empire by purchasing hundreds of foreclosed homes across southeastern Wisconsin, according to the news source. In 2011, however, this empire collapsed, prompting the mogul to declare bankruptcy. Now, prosecutors allege that Brunner and his son hid assets from bankruptcy court and that the elder Brunner attempted to conceal more than $7 million in assets from lenders.
In an ironic twist of fate, Brunner was arrested in a home that he lost to foreclosure earlier this year, according to the Milwaukee – Wisconsin Journal Sentinel. After federal prosecutors informed U.S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph that Brunner and his son were avoiding service of a summons ordering them to appear in court, Joseph issued the warrant for their arrests. The two surrendered peacefully and were taken into custody around 7:30 a.m.
According to a separate article by the Journal Sentinal, Brunner claimed that his business of rehabilitating and renting out foreclosed properties generated approximately $1.5 million to $2 million per year at its peak. By 2011, Brunner was almost $20 million in debt and filing for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law.
In 2012, Brunner’s bankruptcy case was thrown out of court for failure to disclose assets.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!