Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
First Detroit Bankruptcy Hearing Set by Judge
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: July 30, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Legal challenges to a historic petition to file for Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy continue, as the city braces for the initial Detroit bankruptcy hearing this week.
Less than one week after Detroit filed for the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history, the city has requested that U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes suspend pensioners’ lawsuits and prevent new ones from being heard in the court over fears that litigation could further slow down what is expected to be a long, arduous case.
Upon setting the first court hearing, Rhodes said he only plans to take up a few issues initially, according to The Associated Press. Already, disputes over worker pensions are expected to be a central issue, as pensioners face the risk of having their payments drastically reduced along with other city debts.
Last week, Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie Aquilina issued a ruling mandating that Detroit Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr withdraw the bankruptcy petition he filed the previous day. Aquilina said that the state law, which permitted Michigan Governor Rick Snyder to approve of the city’s decision to seek bankruptcy protection, violated the state constitution, according to Reuters.
A representative acting on Gov. Snyder’s behalf later filed an appeal to Aquilina’s ruling. The AP reports that Snyder prefers the bankruptcy court to rule on pension issues, rather than the county circuit court.
Despite the Aquilina ruling, the bankruptcy court will hear Kevyn Orr’s motion to enjoin the state court litigation. Orr also requested that the bankruptcy court settle deadlines, timelines, and other logistical issues in the case, Reuters notes.
Union representatives are pushing to make retiree pension benefits a priority ahead of other bankruptcy law claims, citing a provision in the Michigan constitution that pensions for public employees “shall not be diminished or impaired.” The issue is expected to weigh heavily in arguments that surround Detroit’s bankruptcy.
- Chapter 9
- Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
- chapter 9 Municipal Bankruptcy
- Detroit
- Detroit Bankruptcy
- Filing Bankruptcy
- Municipal Bankruptcy
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.