Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 6, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Businesses hoping to boost sales this holiday season should exercise caution when sending autodialed text messages. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently issued a warning that so-called “robotexts” are subject to restrictions on making autodialed calls to cell phones imposed by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
As we have previously discussed on our Business Law News blog, the TCPA was originally enacted to address the proliferation of automated telemarketing calls to private residences. The federal statute prohibits any person from, among other things, “initiat[ing] any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency purposes, is made solely pursuant to the collection of a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States, or is exempted by rule or order by the [Federal Communications] Commission….”
Given the popularity of cell phones, the TCPA has been expanded to include restrictions on autodialed calls and prerecorded calls to wireless numbers. In a 2015 TCPA Omnibus Declaratory Ruling and Order, the FCC expressly clarified that text messages sent to cell phones using any automatic telephone dialing system are subject to the TCPA. As the agency explained, just as texts are a subset of “calls” under the TCPA, “robotexts” are a subset of “robocalls.” The order also described an “automatic telephone dialing system” (or “autodialer”) as any equipment that has the “capacity” to store or produce numbers to be dialed and dial them “without human intervention” but does not need to have the “present ability” to do so.
The TCPA prohibits autodialed calls or text messages, as well as prerecorded calls, unless made with the prior express consent of the called party, to any telephone number assigned to a cell phone or other mobile device (such as a pager), unless the calls or text messages are: (1) made for emergency purposes; (2) free to the end user and have been exempted by the Commission, subject to conditions prescribed to protect consumer privacy rights; or (3) made solely to collect debts “owed to or guaranteed by the United States.”
Businesses that send autodialed text messages to mobile devices have the burden of proving that they obtained the required consent. As highlighted by the FCC, “[t]he fact that a consumer’s wireless number is in the contact list of another person’s wireless phone does not, by itself, demonstrate consent to receive robotexts.” In addition, recipients may revoke their consent at any time using any reasonable method.
In its robotext enforcement advisory, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau expressly states that it “will rigorously enforce the important consumer protections in the TCPA and our corresponding rules.” It also reminds those who initiate autodialed texts to mobile devices that violations of the TCPA can be costly, including forfeiture penalties up to $18,936 per violation.
Businesses that advertise their products and services using autodialed texts should review their procedures to ensure they comply with the TCPA. Notably, businesses should keep detailed records of consumer consents, which can help avoid costly fines should the FCC come knocking.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dennis Linken, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!