Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 6, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comBusinesses hoping to boost sales this holiday season should exercise caution when sending autodialed text messages. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently issued a warning that so-called “robotexts” are subject to restrictions on making autodialed calls to cell phones imposed by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
As we have previously discussed on our Business Law News blog, the TCPA was originally enacted to address the proliferation of automated telemarketing calls to private residences. The federal statute prohibits any person from, among other things, “initiat[ing] any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency purposes, is made solely pursuant to the collection of a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States, or is exempted by rule or order by the [Federal Communications] Commission….”
Given the popularity of cell phones, the TCPA has been expanded to include restrictions on autodialed calls and prerecorded calls to wireless numbers. In a 2015 TCPA Omnibus Declaratory Ruling and Order, the FCC expressly clarified that text messages sent to cell phones using any automatic telephone dialing system are subject to the TCPA. As the agency explained, just as texts are a subset of “calls” under the TCPA, “robotexts” are a subset of “robocalls.” The order also described an “automatic telephone dialing system” (or “autodialer”) as any equipment that has the “capacity” to store or produce numbers to be dialed and dial them “without human intervention” but does not need to have the “present ability” to do so.
The TCPA prohibits autodialed calls or text messages, as well as prerecorded calls, unless made with the prior express consent of the called party, to any telephone number assigned to a cell phone or other mobile device (such as a pager), unless the calls or text messages are: (1) made for emergency purposes; (2) free to the end user and have been exempted by the Commission, subject to conditions prescribed to protect consumer privacy rights; or (3) made solely to collect debts “owed to or guaranteed by the United States.”
Businesses that send autodialed text messages to mobile devices have the burden of proving that they obtained the required consent. As highlighted by the FCC, “[t]he fact that a consumer’s wireless number is in the contact list of another person’s wireless phone does not, by itself, demonstrate consent to receive robotexts.” In addition, recipients may revoke their consent at any time using any reasonable method.
In its robotext enforcement advisory, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau expressly states that it “will rigorously enforce the important consumer protections in the TCPA and our corresponding rules.” It also reminds those who initiate autodialed texts to mobile devices that violations of the TCPA can be costly, including forfeiture penalties up to $18,936 per violation.
Businesses that advertise their products and services using autodialed texts should review their procedures to ensure they comply with the TCPA. Notably, businesses should keep detailed records of consumer consents, which can help avoid costly fines should the FCC come knocking.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dennis Linken, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Businesses hoping to boost sales this holiday season should exercise caution when sending autodialed text messages. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently issued a warning that so-called “robotexts” are subject to restrictions on making autodialed calls to cell phones imposed by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
As we have previously discussed on our Business Law News blog, the TCPA was originally enacted to address the proliferation of automated telemarketing calls to private residences. The federal statute prohibits any person from, among other things, “initiat[ing] any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency purposes, is made solely pursuant to the collection of a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States, or is exempted by rule or order by the [Federal Communications] Commission….”
Given the popularity of cell phones, the TCPA has been expanded to include restrictions on autodialed calls and prerecorded calls to wireless numbers. In a 2015 TCPA Omnibus Declaratory Ruling and Order, the FCC expressly clarified that text messages sent to cell phones using any automatic telephone dialing system are subject to the TCPA. As the agency explained, just as texts are a subset of “calls” under the TCPA, “robotexts” are a subset of “robocalls.” The order also described an “automatic telephone dialing system” (or “autodialer”) as any equipment that has the “capacity” to store or produce numbers to be dialed and dial them “without human intervention” but does not need to have the “present ability” to do so.
The TCPA prohibits autodialed calls or text messages, as well as prerecorded calls, unless made with the prior express consent of the called party, to any telephone number assigned to a cell phone or other mobile device (such as a pager), unless the calls or text messages are: (1) made for emergency purposes; (2) free to the end user and have been exempted by the Commission, subject to conditions prescribed to protect consumer privacy rights; or (3) made solely to collect debts “owed to or guaranteed by the United States.”
Businesses that send autodialed text messages to mobile devices have the burden of proving that they obtained the required consent. As highlighted by the FCC, “[t]he fact that a consumer’s wireless number is in the contact list of another person’s wireless phone does not, by itself, demonstrate consent to receive robotexts.” In addition, recipients may revoke their consent at any time using any reasonable method.
In its robotext enforcement advisory, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau expressly states that it “will rigorously enforce the important consumer protections in the TCPA and our corresponding rules.” It also reminds those who initiate autodialed texts to mobile devices that violations of the TCPA can be costly, including forfeiture penalties up to $18,936 per violation.
Businesses that advertise their products and services using autodialed texts should review their procedures to ensure they comply with the TCPA. Notably, businesses should keep detailed records of consumer consents, which can help avoid costly fines should the FCC come knocking.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dennis Linken, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!