A daughter’s ill-advised Facebook post recently cost her father $80,000 of his settlement in an age-discrimination case.
As has been widely reported in the media, Gulliver Preparatory School agreed to pay Patrick Snay, 69, an $80,000 lump-sum payment to resolve alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and retaliation. However, four days after the settlement, Gulliver informed Snay that he had violated the settlement’s confidentiality agreement when his daughter posted the following message to her 1,200 followers: “Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver…Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.”
Earlier this month, a Florida judge refused to enforce the settlement agreement. Judge Linda Ann Wells found that Snay violated the settlement agreement by discussing its terms with his daughter. “His daughter then did precisely what the confidentiality agreement was designed to prevent,” she wrote.
Settlement agreements routinely contain a confidentiality provision that prevents both sides from discussing the terms of the settlement with outside third parties.
From a defendant’s perspective, the appearance of a lucrative settlement may increase the chances of future litigation or be used against the company in future settlement negotiations. Plaintiffs also value privacy and may not want the facts of their case to become public knowledge. Even plaintiffs who are not overly wary of confidentiality can use it as a bargaining chip during negotiations.
So what should an effective confidentiality clause contain? Below are a few key tips:
Explicitly state that the terms of the settlement along with the facts of the underlying dispute and the negotiation process are strictly confidential.
Identify any situations in which either party may divulge the terms of the settlement, i.e. disclosure to attorneys and accountants, disclosure to government regulators, disclosure in court filings to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement.
Clearly state that violating the confidentiality provision constitutes a material breach of the settlement agreement;
Set forth the penalty for breaching the settlement agreement, which typically involves the payment of liquidated damages; and
Specifically outline the appropriate response that the parties should give when asked about the resolution of the lawsuit.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the use of settlement agreements, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs
When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments
New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy
A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
