
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: March 7, 2014

Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comA daughter’s ill-advised Facebook post recently cost her father $80,000 of his settlement in an age-discrimination case.

As has been widely reported in the media, Gulliver Preparatory School agreed to pay Patrick Snay, 69, an $80,000 lump-sum payment to resolve alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and retaliation. However, four days after the settlement, Gulliver informed Snay that he had violated the settlement’s confidentiality agreement when his daughter posted the following message to her 1,200 followers: “Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver…Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.”
Earlier this month, a Florida judge refused to enforce the settlement agreement. Judge Linda Ann Wells found that Snay violated the settlement agreement by discussing its terms with his daughter. “His daughter then did precisely what the confidentiality agreement was designed to prevent,” she wrote.
Settlement agreements routinely contain a confidentiality provision that prevents both sides from discussing the terms of the settlement with outside third parties.
From a defendant’s perspective, the appearance of a lucrative settlement may increase the chances of future litigation or be used against the company in future settlement negotiations. Plaintiffs also value privacy and may not want the facts of their case to become public knowledge. Even plaintiffs who are not overly wary of confidentiality can use it as a bargaining chip during negotiations.
So what should an effective confidentiality clause contain? Below are a few key tips:
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the use of settlement agreements, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!