Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 23, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has forced most New Jersey businesses to conduct their operations via a “remote” workforce. So what happens when documents need to be signed in order to become legally binding?

For businesses that are accustomed to dealing exclusively with paper documents, conducting contract negotiation and execution electronically can be daunting. Some concern is justified, as there are mistakes that can be made along the way that may threaten the enforceability of the agreement.
To start, both electronic contracts and digital signatures are valid, provided certain conditions are satisfied. Under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act), which went into effect in 2000, digital and electronic signatures are just as legal as their paper and ink counterparts for transactions in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce. The ESIGN Act specifically provides that a contract or signature “may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.”
The federal e-sign law defines an e-signature as “an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record.” Examples include typing your name, uploading a written signature, and clicking a button that says, “I agree.”
Most business contracts can be signed electronically. However, there are still a few types of contracts that must be on paper to be valid and enforceable, although many of these do not frequently arise in the business context. They include:
Under the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act of 1999, which is now in force in all 50 states, a contract “may not be denied legal effect solely because an electronic record was used in its formation.” Nonetheless, the basic principles of contract law still apply. In order for a contract to be enforceable, there must be a valid offer and acceptance, supported by consideration. If one party sends an email (or other electronic message) proposing different terms, the offer is considered rejected, and the contract formation process starts fresh. The parties must also intend to be contractually bound. While intent need not be explicitly expressed in email correspondence, it just must be clear that the parties were planning to agree on a contract.
To avoid unintentionally being legally bound during the course of negotiations, it is imperative to make it clear to the other party that your electronic correspondence should be considered non-binding. More importantly, your correspondence should expressly state that any agreement is contingent upon the execution of a formal written contract.
Through the use of e-signatures, businesses can legally execute contracts from “home.” To make the process run more smoothly, below are a few tips to keep in mind:
Given that employees are largely working remotely and often with less supervision, businesses should make sure that all employees who are authorized to execute contracts understand how to properly negotiate and execute agreements electronically. In many cases, the development of online training or a best practices manual may be warranted.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dennis Linken, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!