The Federal Government is Looking to get Back in the Business of Regulating Sports Betting…
The federal government is looking to get back in the business of regulating sports betting in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court striking down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA). The Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018 would require states like New Jersey to meet minimum standards imposed by the Department of Justice (DOJ).
As detailed in greater depth in prior articles, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for New Jersey to authorize sports betting within the state. New Jersey first passed a law establishing a regulatory regime for legalized sports betting in 2012. However, the country’s major professional sports leagues and the NCAA filed a lawsuit, in which the Department of Justice joined. The suit alleged that New Jersey had violated PASPA, the federal law which expressly prohibited government entities, including the states, from authorizing sports wagering.
In Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, the Supreme Court agreed with New Jersey that PASPA was unconstitutional because it prohibited state authorization of sports wagering. “It is as if federal officers were installed in state legislative chambers and were armed with the authority to stop legislators from voting on any offending proposals,” Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. wrote, “A more direct affront to state sovereignty is not easy to imagine.”
Following the Supreme Court’s decision, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island have legalized sports gambling. Several other states are also working to approve it. In New Jersey, sports betting is now authorized in New Jersey casinos and racetracks, as well as online.
As we enter 2019, additional regulatory hurdles could slow the growth of the sports gambling industry. On December 20, 2018, Sens. Orrin Hatch and Sen. Chuck Schumer introduced the Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018, which would establish federal oversight over the sports betting industry. Notably, Sen. Hatch was one of the authors of PASPA. “This bill is the first step towards ensuring that sports betting is done right in the states that choose to legalize it. Just as importantly, it provides protections for states that choose not to go down that path,” he said in a press statement.
As outlined by Sens. Hatch and Schumer, the Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018 would:
Prohibit the acceptance of sports wagers, with exceptions for social gambling and states that meet certain minimum standards;
Permit states to authorize online sports wagering to provide a regulated alternative to the illegal, offshore market;
Prohibit sports wagers on amateur sporting events except the Olympics and college sports;
Restrict certain sports wagers when necessary to protect contest integrity;
Prohibit sports wagering by individuals younger than 21; athletes, coaches, officials, and others associated with sports organizations; and individuals convicted of certain federal crimes related to sports wagering;
Require that sports wagering operators use data provided or licensed by sports organizations to determine the outcome of sports wagers through 2024, and set requirements for data used thereafter;
Establish a national self-exclusion list;
Put in place a variety of consumer protections, including disclosure, advertising, and reserve requirements;
Establish recordkeeping and suspicious transaction reporting requirements;
Update existing casino anti-money laundering laws to include sports wagering operators;
Provide a process whereby states may compact with each other to permits interstate sports wagering;
Designate a non-profit National Sports Wagering Clearinghouse to, inter alia, receive and share anonymized sports wagering data and suspicious transaction reports among sports wagering operators, state regulators, sports organizations, and federal and state law enforcement;
Dedicate revenue from the existing sports wagering excise tax to law enforcement and programs for the prevention and treatment of gambling disorder;
Update the Wire Act to permit certain interstate sports wagers, while also providing additional enforcement authorities such as a state cause of action and a new mechanism for the Department of Justice to target unlicensed, offshore sports wagering websites;
Expand the Sports Bribery Act to cover extortion and blackmail, prohibit sports wagers based on nonpublic information, and strengthen whistleblower protections; and
Provide additional authority to the Department of Health and Human Services to prevent, monitor, and treat gambling addiction.
The NFL and NCAA have already voiced support for the Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018. “The Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act reaffirms the long-standing commitment of Congress to protecting the integrity of American athletics. We appreciate the bipartisan leadership demonstrated by Senators Hatch and Schumer in bringing forth this commonsense legislation, and we urge its swift enactment,” said Jocelyn Moore, National Football League Executive Vice President.
Not surprisingly, the sports betting industry favors a more “hands off” approach. In support, the American Gaming Association noted that the gaming industry already has a strict regulatory climate. “This bill is the epitome of a solution in search of a problem, representing an unprecedented and inappropriate expansion of federal involvement in the gaming industry,” said Sara Slane, Senior Vice President of Public Affairs for the American Gaming Association.
Given the upcoming leadership changes in Congress, it is unclear when and if the federal sports wagering bill will advance. We will, however, continue to closely monitor its progress. For businesses looking to enter New Jersey’s legal sports betting industry, we encourage you to work with a knowledgeable New Jersey business attorney who can help you navigate the regulatory framework.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Ashley Brinn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Businesses Are Facing Financial Headwinds—A Practical Guide
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
