Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 4, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn response, Will.i.Am filed a trademark lawsuit, claiming Pharrell Williams company name is too similar to his i.am+ product and that it could be confusing, as both artists are signed to the same record label and make similar music.
The two have since settled the lawsuit, but it brings up an interesting question, what does a celebrity need to do in order to trademark a business?
The process is pretty straightforward and an application can generally be completed online in less than 90 minutes, according to The Wall Street Journal. The simplest place to go is the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Web site, www.uspto.gov. It generally costs between $275 and $325.
However, just because filling out an application is easy doesn’t mean it will be approved. In fact, it is best to browse the Trademark Electronic Search System database prior to doing anything to find out if another company has already registered a similar trademark. In the above case, Pharrell could have found that Will.i.Am had trademarked his product line with a similar name. If the chosen mark is already in use, the application will be rejected.
There could be some hurdles based upon what the name is that’s being trademarked. For example, it would be very difficult to trademark a business name that is a common phrase. The Wall Street Journal gives two examples of businesses that probably would be rejected – “The Ice Cream Shop” and “We Sell Plants.”
Celebrities looking to trademark a business venture as well as those concerned about the possibility of it being similar to something else may want to seek the advice of an attorney.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!