An investigation into illegal sports gambling has finally come to a close, with local, state and federal authorities announcing they have busted a multibillion-dollar gambling ring in Plano, Texas.
As details of the case emerge and states continue to lobby for legalized sports betting, questions are arising about whether allowing this type of gambling in a regulated atmosphere might cut down on pervasive sports gambling law violations.
The sports gambling ring in question was based in Texas, but operated via internet to nearly every state in the country, CBS 11 News reports. The Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Attorney’s office joined the ongoing investigation in 2006. When the ring was finally broken up, authorities found stacks of gold, millions in cash and paperwork revealing that the ring may have handled more than $5 billion in gambling profits.
The bust comes to light amid New Jersey’s appeal to allow sports gambling in local regulated casinos, despite a recent court ruling that prohibited the state from moving forward with its plans. However, Gov. Chris Christie said he plans to take the issue to the U.S. Supreme Court if need be, and noted that it’s unfair that certain states – such as Nevada – are permitted to hold a monopoly on sports betting.
As state’s rights are likely to come into play in the ongoing lawsuit, some are questioning whether legalizing sports betting and managing it in a controlled environment would be preferable to deciphering existing gambling legislation and imposing restrictions on states, many of which are struggling for revenue. Amid the economic constraints many states are facing, revenue from sports betting may help alleviate budgetary constraints. On the other hand, the 1992 federal law that limits sports betting to four U.S. states has been historically upheld by the courts. As New Jersey moves forward with its appeal, it will be interesting to see how the pendulum swings.
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
