Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
If You Don't Want to Lose the Time, Don't Do the Crime
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 17, 2023
Key Contacts
Back
New Jersey Court Holds that an Employee Terminated for Disciplinary Reasons not entitled to Payout of PTO
On February 22, 2023, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division ruled that a hospital employee discharged for disciplinary reasons was not entitled to payment of accrued paid time off (PTO) because the hospital had an express policy that PTO would not be paid out in such situations.
In HMH Hospitals Corp. v. Warren, the appellate court found that the employee was not entitled to payment for any PTO accrued prior to termination because accrued PTO does not constitute wages under New Jersey state law and did not have to be paid out unless as provided by an employer’s PTO policy. In this case, the employer’s PTO policy provided that an employee was not entitled to be paid for unused PTO upon termination unless the employee provided at least three weeks prior notice or when “employment is terminated in connection with a disciplinary action.”1 It is important to note that this policy was only in place a few months prior to the termination.
Ms. Warren, who was a certified nurse’s assistant, sought payment after her termination for admitted misconduct for PTO hours she accrued for the three years prior to her termination. After the request was denied, Warren filed a claim with the Wage Collection Section, Division of Wage and Hour Compliance, of the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development, which assigned the matter to a wage collection referee, who conducted a hearing.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the referee found that Warren was entitled to PTO at Warren’s rates of pay at the time the PTO was accrued, however, only until the date the new PTO policy prohibiting the payment of PTO for disciplinary terminations took effect. The hospital timely appealed the referee’s determination. The lower court ruled that the company policy denying payment for accrued PTO hours was void because it found that accrued PTO constituted wages under the New Jersey Wage Payment Law and that there was therefore an obligation to pay out PTO hours upon the employee’s discharge.
However, the appellate division overruled that decision. The appellate court held that the hospital’s “PTO policy set the terms for Warren’s entitlement to pay for accrued PTO hours, and, under the policy’s express terms, she was not entitled to compensation….” Specifically, the appellate court stated, “the accrued hours constituted a benefit entitling Warren to payment at a point in the future but not as ‘direct monetary compensation for labor or services rendered” and that the hospital was “not required to offer, pay, or provide PTO in the first instance.”
What Employers Should Do
The decision by the New Jersey appellate court highlights the importance of using precise language in a PTO policy, especially when detailing whether employees are or are not entitled to payment for accrued time. The court placed emphasis on the wording of the hospital’s PTO policy indicating that the language concerning disciplinary discharge “set the terms” for when PTO would not be paid and thus. The court further noted that since accrued PTO does not constitute wages in New Jersey, employers are “to contract regarding a term of employment that does not violate the law.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
If You Don't Want to Lose the Time, Don't Do the Crime
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
New Jersey Court Holds that an Employee Terminated for Disciplinary Reasons not entitled to Payout of PTO
On February 22, 2023, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division ruled that a hospital employee discharged for disciplinary reasons was not entitled to payment of accrued paid time off (PTO) because the hospital had an express policy that PTO would not be paid out in such situations.
In HMH Hospitals Corp. v. Warren, the appellate court found that the employee was not entitled to payment for any PTO accrued prior to termination because accrued PTO does not constitute wages under New Jersey state law and did not have to be paid out unless as provided by an employer’s PTO policy. In this case, the employer’s PTO policy provided that an employee was not entitled to be paid for unused PTO upon termination unless the employee provided at least three weeks prior notice or when “employment is terminated in connection with a disciplinary action.”1 It is important to note that this policy was only in place a few months prior to the termination.
Ms. Warren, who was a certified nurse’s assistant, sought payment after her termination for admitted misconduct for PTO hours she accrued for the three years prior to her termination. After the request was denied, Warren filed a claim with the Wage Collection Section, Division of Wage and Hour Compliance, of the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development, which assigned the matter to a wage collection referee, who conducted a hearing.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the referee found that Warren was entitled to PTO at Warren’s rates of pay at the time the PTO was accrued, however, only until the date the new PTO policy prohibiting the payment of PTO for disciplinary terminations took effect. The hospital timely appealed the referee’s determination. The lower court ruled that the company policy denying payment for accrued PTO hours was void because it found that accrued PTO constituted wages under the New Jersey Wage Payment Law and that there was therefore an obligation to pay out PTO hours upon the employee’s discharge.
However, the appellate division overruled that decision. The appellate court held that the hospital’s “PTO policy set the terms for Warren’s entitlement to pay for accrued PTO hours, and, under the policy’s express terms, she was not entitled to compensation….” Specifically, the appellate court stated, “the accrued hours constituted a benefit entitling Warren to payment at a point in the future but not as ‘direct monetary compensation for labor or services rendered” and that the hospital was “not required to offer, pay, or provide PTO in the first instance.”
What Employers Should Do
The decision by the New Jersey appellate court highlights the importance of using precise language in a PTO policy, especially when detailing whether employees are or are not entitled to payment for accrued time. The court placed emphasis on the wording of the hospital’s PTO policy indicating that the language concerning disciplinary discharge “set the terms” for when PTO would not be paid and thus. The court further noted that since accrued PTO does not constitute wages in New Jersey, employers are “to contract regarding a term of employment that does not violate the law.”