Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 25, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has announced that it is settling the sex discrimination lawsuit filed against Ventura Corporation. Ventura, based in Puerto Rico, is the wholesaler of beauty products, jewelry and other personal care items to retail sellers. This case should serve to remind us that discrimination is not just a “one way street.”
The EEOC’s lawsuit alleged that Ventura engaged in a pattern of refusing to elevate male applicants into Zone Manager and Support Manager positions. The case arose upon the complaint of employee Erick Zaya, who was promoted to be a Zone Manager only after he complained about the discriminatory practices. However, once promoted, it was alleged that Ventura set him up for failure and termination in retaliation for his complaints regarding the sex-based hiring practices.
Complicating the case, the EEOC charged that Ventura lost or destroyed a significant amount of important evidence, including job applications from qualified male applicants and emails from important decision-makers. If true, this would have constituted “spoliation,” which is the intentional destruction of evidence. As a result, the EEOC sought sanctions against Ventura. The court, agreeing with the EEOC, indicated that if the case proceeded to trial, it would instruct the jurors that they could assume that the missing evidence would support the EEOC’s allegations.
Ventura has agreed to pay $354,250 to settle the lawsuit, which includes $150,000 to be paid to the complainant. The remainder of the settlement funds will be distributed to a class of qualified male job applicants who applied, but were not considered by Ventura for Zone Manager or Support Manager positions from 2004 to present.
The settlement also requires Ventura to implement a detailed applicant tracking system and actively promote the accountability of supervisors for discrimination prevention. Ventura must provide anti-discrimination training to all of its employees, including specific training to managers who play a role in the hiring process. Finally, the EEOC is requiring Ventura to provide the agency with bi-annual hiring reports for three years.
“This case is another reminder that federal law protects both men and women from gender discrimination,” said Robert E. Weisberg, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Miami District Office. “We are pleased that we have been able to secure relief not only for Mr. Zayas, but also for the many qualified applicants who were not considered by Ventura for employment simply because they were male.”
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss sex discrimination in the workplace, please contact me, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher

For many New Jersey businesses, growth is a primary objective for the New Year. However, it is important to recognize that growth involves both opportunity and risk. For example, business expansion often results in complex contracts, an increased workforce, new regulatory requirements, and heightened exposure to disputes. Without proactive planning, even routine growth can lead […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!