Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 25, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has announced that it is settling the sex discrimination lawsuit filed against Ventura Corporation. Ventura, based in Puerto Rico, is the wholesaler of beauty products, jewelry and other personal care items to retail sellers. This case should serve to remind us that discrimination is not just a “one way street.”
The EEOC’s lawsuit alleged that Ventura engaged in a pattern of refusing to elevate male applicants into Zone Manager and Support Manager positions. The case arose upon the complaint of employee Erick Zaya, who was promoted to be a Zone Manager only after he complained about the discriminatory practices. However, once promoted, it was alleged that Ventura set him up for failure and termination in retaliation for his complaints regarding the sex-based hiring practices.
Complicating the case, the EEOC charged that Ventura lost or destroyed a significant amount of important evidence, including job applications from qualified male applicants and emails from important decision-makers. If true, this would have constituted “spoliation,” which is the intentional destruction of evidence. As a result, the EEOC sought sanctions against Ventura. The court, agreeing with the EEOC, indicated that if the case proceeded to trial, it would instruct the jurors that they could assume that the missing evidence would support the EEOC’s allegations.
Ventura has agreed to pay $354,250 to settle the lawsuit, which includes $150,000 to be paid to the complainant. The remainder of the settlement funds will be distributed to a class of qualified male job applicants who applied, but were not considered by Ventura for Zone Manager or Support Manager positions from 2004 to present.
The settlement also requires Ventura to implement a detailed applicant tracking system and actively promote the accountability of supervisors for discrimination prevention. Ventura must provide anti-discrimination training to all of its employees, including specific training to managers who play a role in the hiring process. Finally, the EEOC is requiring Ventura to provide the agency with bi-annual hiring reports for three years.
“This case is another reminder that federal law protects both men and women from gender discrimination,” said Robert E. Weisberg, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Miami District Office. “We are pleased that we have been able to secure relief not only for Mr. Zayas, but also for the many qualified applicants who were not considered by Ventura for employment simply because they were male.”
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss sex discrimination in the workplace, please contact me, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
NYC Real Estate and Litigation Attorney Ryan O. Miller and Team Join Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC New York City, NY – August 13, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has strengthened its Real Estate and Litigation practices with the addition of four New York City-based attorneys. Ryan Miller, who joins as a partner, is well known for […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!