The EEOC recently sent a strong reminder that the ADA applies equally to physical and mental illness.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently sent a strong reminder that the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) applies equally to physical and mental conditions. The agency published several documents regarding the rights of individuals with mental health impairments under the ADA.
ADA Charges Involving Mental Illness on the Rise
To start, the EEOC guidance does not provide any new legal interpretations regarding how the ADA applies to mental illness. Rather, it is intended to make sure employees understand their rights. As the EEOC explained in a press statement:
EEOC charge data shows that charges of discrimination based on mental health conditions are on the rise. During fiscal year 2016, preliminary data shows that EEOC resolved almost 5,000 charges of discrimination based on mental health conditions, obtaining approximately $20 million for individuals with mental health conditions who were unlawfully denied employment and reasonable accommodations.
EEOC Guidance Highlights ADA Compliance Issues
As employers should be aware, the ADA protects job applicants and employees with mental health conditions from employment discrimination and harassment based on their conditions. It may also entitle them to reasonable accommodations at work. The EEOC’s latest guidance, entitled “Depression, PTSD, & Other Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace: Your Legal Rights,” addresses a range of questions employee may have regarding how to get an accommodation, the types of accommodations available, and restrictions on employer access to medical information, confidentiality, and the role of the EEOC in enforcing the rights of people with disabilities.
EEOC Guidance Regarding Mental Illness
While the document is not geared towards employers, the EEOC guidance highlights several important ADA compliance issues that often arise when dealing with workers with mental illness. Below are several key takeaways:
Avoiding stereotypes
The EEOC emphasizes employers “can’t rely on myths or stereotypes” about mental health conditions when deciding whether an applicant or employee can perform a job or poses a safety risk. Rather, employers must have objective evidence that the worker can’t perform the required job duties, or that they would create a significant safety risk, even with a reasonable accommodation
Privacy rights
The EEOC highlights the importance of confidentiality, specifically noting that employers are only authorized to make medical-related inquiries in certain situations. They include the following: when the worker asks for a reasonable accommodation; after making a job offer, but before employment begins, as long as everyone entering the same job category is asked the same questions; when engaging in affirmative action for people with disabilities (such as an employer tracking the disability status of its applicant pool in order to assess its recruitment and hiring efforts, or a public sector employer considering whether special hiring rules may apply), in which case employees may choose whether to respond; and on the job, when there is objective evidence that an employee may be unable to do the job or may pose a safety risk because of a mental illness or condition.
Qualifying conditions
The guidance stresses that a mental condition does not need to be permanent or severe to be “substantially limiting” and, therefore, entitled to reasonable accommodation. According to the EEOC, “Mental health conditions like major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) should easily qualify, and many others will qualify as well.”
Reasonable accommodations
The EEOC lists several potential accommodations for workers with mental health conditions, including altered break and work schedules (e.g., scheduling work around therapy appointments), quiet office space or devices that create a quiet work environment, changes in supervisory methods (e.g., written instructions from a supervisor who usually does not provide them), specific shift assignments, and permission to work from home. The agency has also published additional guidance for mental health professionals, entitled “The Mental Health Provider’s Role in a Client’s Request for a Reasonable Accommodation at Work.”
The Bottom Line
The bottom-line is that employers should be mindful that mental conditions are covered under the ADA. To avoid potential liability, managers and human resources must understand what constitutes employment discrimination under the ADA and how to properly handle requests for accommodation.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
EEOC Reminds Employers Mental Illness Is Protected Under ADA
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The EEOC recently sent a strong reminder that the ADA applies equally to physical and mental illness.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently sent a strong reminder that the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) applies equally to physical and mental conditions. The agency published several documents regarding the rights of individuals with mental health impairments under the ADA.
ADA Charges Involving Mental Illness on the Rise
To start, the EEOC guidance does not provide any new legal interpretations regarding how the ADA applies to mental illness. Rather, it is intended to make sure employees understand their rights. As the EEOC explained in a press statement:
EEOC charge data shows that charges of discrimination based on mental health conditions are on the rise. During fiscal year 2016, preliminary data shows that EEOC resolved almost 5,000 charges of discrimination based on mental health conditions, obtaining approximately $20 million for individuals with mental health conditions who were unlawfully denied employment and reasonable accommodations.
EEOC Guidance Highlights ADA Compliance Issues
As employers should be aware, the ADA protects job applicants and employees with mental health conditions from employment discrimination and harassment based on their conditions. It may also entitle them to reasonable accommodations at work. The EEOC’s latest guidance, entitled “Depression, PTSD, & Other Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace: Your Legal Rights,” addresses a range of questions employee may have regarding how to get an accommodation, the types of accommodations available, and restrictions on employer access to medical information, confidentiality, and the role of the EEOC in enforcing the rights of people with disabilities.
EEOC Guidance Regarding Mental Illness
While the document is not geared towards employers, the EEOC guidance highlights several important ADA compliance issues that often arise when dealing with workers with mental illness. Below are several key takeaways:
Avoiding stereotypes
The EEOC emphasizes employers “can’t rely on myths or stereotypes” about mental health conditions when deciding whether an applicant or employee can perform a job or poses a safety risk. Rather, employers must have objective evidence that the worker can’t perform the required job duties, or that they would create a significant safety risk, even with a reasonable accommodation
Privacy rights
The EEOC highlights the importance of confidentiality, specifically noting that employers are only authorized to make medical-related inquiries in certain situations. They include the following: when the worker asks for a reasonable accommodation; after making a job offer, but before employment begins, as long as everyone entering the same job category is asked the same questions; when engaging in affirmative action for people with disabilities (such as an employer tracking the disability status of its applicant pool in order to assess its recruitment and hiring efforts, or a public sector employer considering whether special hiring rules may apply), in which case employees may choose whether to respond; and on the job, when there is objective evidence that an employee may be unable to do the job or may pose a safety risk because of a mental illness or condition.
Qualifying conditions
The guidance stresses that a mental condition does not need to be permanent or severe to be “substantially limiting” and, therefore, entitled to reasonable accommodation. According to the EEOC, “Mental health conditions like major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) should easily qualify, and many others will qualify as well.”
Reasonable accommodations
The EEOC lists several potential accommodations for workers with mental health conditions, including altered break and work schedules (e.g., scheduling work around therapy appointments), quiet office space or devices that create a quiet work environment, changes in supervisory methods (e.g., written instructions from a supervisor who usually does not provide them), specific shift assignments, and permission to work from home. The agency has also published additional guidance for mental health professionals, entitled “The Mental Health Provider’s Role in a Client’s Request for a Reasonable Accommodation at Work.”
The Bottom Line
The bottom-line is that employers should be mindful that mental conditions are covered under the ADA. To avoid potential liability, managers and human resources must understand what constitutes employment discrimination under the ADA and how to properly handle requests for accommodation.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
