Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 14, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently sent a strong reminder that the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) applies equally to physical and mental conditions. The agency published several documents regarding the rights of individuals with mental health impairments under the ADA.
To start, the EEOC guidance does not provide any new legal interpretations regarding how the ADA applies to mental illness. Rather, it is intended to make sure employees understand their rights. As the EEOC explained in a press statement:
EEOC charge data shows that charges of discrimination based on mental health conditions are on the rise. During fiscal year 2016, preliminary data shows that EEOC resolved almost 5,000 charges of discrimination based on mental health conditions, obtaining approximately $20 million for individuals with mental health conditions who were unlawfully denied employment and reasonable accommodations.
As employers should be aware, the ADA protects job applicants and employees with mental health conditions from employment discrimination and harassment based on their conditions. It may also entitle them to reasonable accommodations at work. The EEOC’s latest guidance, entitled “Depression, PTSD, & Other Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace: Your Legal Rights,” addresses a range of questions employee may have regarding how to get an accommodation, the types of accommodations available, and restrictions on employer access to medical information, confidentiality, and the role of the EEOC in enforcing the rights of people with disabilities.
While the document is not geared towards employers, the EEOC guidance highlights several important ADA compliance issues that often arise when dealing with workers with mental illness. Below are several key takeaways:
The EEOC emphasizes employers “can’t rely on myths or stereotypes” about mental health conditions when deciding whether an applicant or employee can perform a job or poses a safety risk. Rather, employers must have objective evidence that the worker can’t perform the required job duties, or that they would create a significant safety risk, even with a reasonable accommodation
The EEOC highlights the importance of confidentiality, specifically noting that employers are only authorized to make medical-related inquiries in certain situations. They include the following: when the worker asks for a reasonable accommodation; after making a job offer, but before employment begins, as long as everyone entering the same job category is asked the same questions; when engaging in affirmative action for people with disabilities (such as an employer tracking the disability status of its applicant pool in order to assess its recruitment and hiring efforts, or a public sector employer considering whether special hiring rules may apply), in which case employees may choose whether to respond; and on the job, when there is objective evidence that an employee may be unable to do the job or may pose a safety risk because of a mental illness or condition.
The guidance stresses that a mental condition does not need to be permanent or severe to be “substantially limiting” and, therefore, entitled to reasonable accommodation. According to the EEOC, “Mental health conditions like major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) should easily qualify, and many others will qualify as well.”
The EEOC lists several potential accommodations for workers with mental health conditions, including altered break and work schedules (e.g., scheduling work around therapy appointments), quiet office space or devices that create a quiet work environment, changes in supervisory methods (e.g., written instructions from a supervisor who usually does not provide them), specific shift assignments, and permission to work from home. The agency has also published additional guidance for mental health professionals, entitled “The Mental Health Provider’s Role in a Client’s Request for a Reasonable Accommodation at Work.”
The bottom-line is that employers should be mindful that mental conditions are covered under the ADA. To avoid potential liability, managers and human resources must understand what constitutes employment discrimination under the ADA and how to properly handle requests for accommodation.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
The bankruptcy legal landscape presents both challenges and opportunities for businesses navigating financial distress. Understanding current bankruptcy trends can help businesses make more informed and strategic decisions. Corporate Bankruptcy Filings Trending Upwards Bankruptcy filings continued to trend upwards in 2024. According to statistics released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, personal and business […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
In December, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced charges against two privately held companies for failing to file a Form D notice, which is generally utilized for exempt securities offerings. Here, the SEC’s enforcement sends a strong message: compliance with regulatory requirements is not optional and failure to comply can have significant consequences. […]
Author: Kenneth C. Oh
On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!