Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 7, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has finally delivered on its promise to enforce the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). Even though Congress passed the law back in 2008, enforcement has been virtually non-existent until recently. Last month, the EEOC announced that it had filed lawsuits against two employers for GINA violations involving medical exams.
As a reminder, GINA prohibits the use of genetic information in making employment decisions in any aspect of employment, such as hiring, firing, promotions, or any other term or condition of employment. Genetic information not only includes information about genetic testing results, but also includes inquiries into the applicant’s family medical history.
In both cases, the defendant-employers required applicants to submit to pre-employment medical exams, which included family medical history questions. In the case against defendant Fabricut, Inc., the medical examiner’s questionnaire allegedly inquired about the existence of heart disease, hypertension, cancer, tuberculosis, diabetes, arthritis and other disorders in the applicant’s family.
Fabricut, Inc. settled the suit for $50,000 while maintaining that it was not aware of the unrelated medical examiner’s request for family history information in the first place and that it never considered such medical history as part of the hiring process.
Despite the lack of intent by the defendant, the EEOC still found the mere use of the medical history questionnaire a significant GINA violation. “GINA applies whenever an employer conducts a medical exam, and employers must make sure that they or their agents do not violate the law,” said Elizabeth Grossman, the regional attorney in the EEOC’s New York District Office.
For employers, these suits should certainly be a “wake up call.” We encourage all employers to review their policies and procedures to ensure that all medical-related requests comply with GINA. When dealing with third parties, employers can take advantage of a safe harbor provision in GINA by including language in all medical requests that instructs employees/applicants to refrain from answering any questions regarding family medical history and genetic testing.
If you have any questions about the EEOC recent enforcement actions or would like to discuss your company’s GINA compliance, please contact me, Gary Young, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!