A Bipartisan Group of Lawmakers Recently Introduced Draft Patent Eligibility Legislation
On May 22, 2019, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced draft patent eligibility legislation. Among other changes, the bill would remove the judicial exceptions to patent eligibility.
Patent eligibility reform is a hot topic. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued revised guidance in January. Now, Congress is also attempting to return predictability to patent eligibility.
Draft Patent Reform Bill Subject to Stakeholder Feedback
The bicameral bill was introduced by U.S. Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE), Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, and Representative Doug Collins (R-GA-9), Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, Hank Johnson (D-GA-4), Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and the Courts, and Steve Stivers (R-OH-15).
It contains more details than the framework Sens. Tillis and Coons released in April. However, the sponsors made it clear that the language contained in the draft bill text is not final and is subject to additional revision.
In the July 10, 2019 Federal Circuit Court decision of Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo, Judge Moore suggested in her opinion that there is no more that the Federal Circuit can do to provide clarity of patent eligibility and that “your only hope lies with the Supreme Court or Congress”. Senator Tillis and Congress have commented that this decision shows that legislative action is both urgent and critical.
Proposed Patent Eligibility Reforms
Section 101 of the Patent Act provides that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter of any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent, therefore, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title”.
Below are several other proposed legislative provisions:
The provisions of section 101 shall be construed in favor of eligibility.
No implicit or other judicially created exceptions to subject matter eligibility, including “abstract ideas,” “laws of nature,” or “natural phenomena,” shall be used to determine patent eligibility under section 101, and all cases establishing or interpreting those exceptions to eligibility are hereby abrogated.
The eligibility of a claimed invention under section 101 shall be determined without regard to: the manner in which the claimed invention was made; whether individual limitations of a claim are well known, conventional or routine; the state of the art at the time of the invention; or any other considerations relating to sections 102, 103, or 112 of this title.
The patent eligibility landscape is poised to change dramatically. However, the extent of the changes and the timeline for implementation are still very uncertain. We encourage entities and individuals that may be impacted by patent reform to check back for updates and contact a member of the Scarinci Hollenbeck Intellectual Property Group with any questions.
If you have any questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Congress Unveils Draft Patent Eligibility Legislation
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
A Bipartisan Group of Lawmakers Recently Introduced Draft Patent Eligibility Legislation
On May 22, 2019, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced draft patent eligibility legislation. Among other changes, the bill would remove the judicial exceptions to patent eligibility.
Patent eligibility reform is a hot topic. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued revised guidance in January. Now, Congress is also attempting to return predictability to patent eligibility.
Draft Patent Reform Bill Subject to Stakeholder Feedback
The bicameral bill was introduced by U.S. Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE), Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, and Representative Doug Collins (R-GA-9), Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, Hank Johnson (D-GA-4), Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and the Courts, and Steve Stivers (R-OH-15).
It contains more details than the framework Sens. Tillis and Coons released in April. However, the sponsors made it clear that the language contained in the draft bill text is not final and is subject to additional revision.
In the July 10, 2019 Federal Circuit Court decision of Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo, Judge Moore suggested in her opinion that there is no more that the Federal Circuit can do to provide clarity of patent eligibility and that “your only hope lies with the Supreme Court or Congress”. Senator Tillis and Congress have commented that this decision shows that legislative action is both urgent and critical.
Proposed Patent Eligibility Reforms
Section 101 of the Patent Act provides that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter of any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent, therefore, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title”.
Below are several other proposed legislative provisions:
The provisions of section 101 shall be construed in favor of eligibility.
No implicit or other judicially created exceptions to subject matter eligibility, including “abstract ideas,” “laws of nature,” or “natural phenomena,” shall be used to determine patent eligibility under section 101, and all cases establishing or interpreting those exceptions to eligibility are hereby abrogated.
The eligibility of a claimed invention under section 101 shall be determined without regard to: the manner in which the claimed invention was made; whether individual limitations of a claim are well known, conventional or routine; the state of the art at the time of the invention; or any other considerations relating to sections 102, 103, or 112 of this title.
The patent eligibility landscape is poised to change dramatically. However, the extent of the changes and the timeline for implementation are still very uncertain. We encourage entities and individuals that may be impacted by patent reform to check back for updates and contact a member of the Scarinci Hollenbeck Intellectual Property Group with any questions.
If you have any questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
