
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comCounsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comChina has long been accused of stealing trade secrets from U.S. companies. To help deter Chinese economic espionage, the Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced a China Initiative. “This Initiative will identify priority Chinese trade theft cases, ensure that we have enough resources dedicated to them, and make sure that we bring them to an appropriate conclusion quickly and effectively,” then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a press statement.
When valuable intellectual property is stolen, the federal government can be a powerful ally. In addition to the civil remedies available to businesses, the federal government can also criminally prosecute employees or other third parties who misappropriate proprietary information.
The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) contains two sections, each addressing a different type of trade secret misappropriation. Section 1831 addresses foreign economic espionage and requires that the theft of a trade secret be done to benefit a foreign government, instrumentality, or agent. Meanwhile, Section 1832 criminalizes trade secret theft “related to or included in a product that is produced for or placed in interstate or foreign commerce, to the economic benefit of anyone other than the owner.” The EEA also allows the federal government to prosecute the knowing possession, receipt, or purchase of misappropriated trade secrets. Penalties under the statute include monetary fines, imprisonment, and disgorgement of any profits derived from the stolen trade secret.
In connection with the new initiative, the DOJ announced an indictment alleging that a Chinese state-owned company, a Taiwan company, and three Taiwan individuals stole trade secrets from Micron, a U.S. semi-conductor company. As highlighted by the DOJ, Micron controls about 20 to 25 percent of the dynamic random access memory (DRAM) industry, which China recently entered in large part due to alleged trade secret theft.
According to the unsealed indictment, Chen Zhengkun, also known as Stephen Chen, served as president of a company acquired by Micron in 2013. He left the company in 2015 and went to work for Taiwan’s United Microelectronics, from where he allegedly orchestrated the theft of trade secrets from Micron worth up to $8.75 billion. United Microelectronics then entered into an agreement with Chinese state-owned Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co., which allowed China to illegally obtain the DRAM technology and then use it to compete against U.S. companies like Micron.
If convicted, the defendants face up to 15 years in prison and $5 million in fines. The companies could face forfeiture and fines worth more than $20 billion. In addition to the criminal charges, the Commerce Department also recently added the Chinese company to the Entity List to prevent it from buying goods and services in the United States.
Assistant Attorney General John Demers, who currently leads the DOJ’s National Security Division, will lead the new initiative. It will also include several U.S. Attorneys and members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
“If China acquires an American company’s most important technology – the very technology that makes it the leader in a field – that company will suffer severe losses, and our national security could even be impacted,” said FBI Director Christopher Wray. “We are committed to continuing to work closely with our federal, state, local, and private sector partners to counter this threat from China.”
As detailed in a DOJ fact sheet, the initiative seeks to accomplish the following:
U.S. companies that conduct business in China or with Chinese companies must be aware of the potential for trade secret theft. The most effective intellectual property protection strategies still start with your business, including tight internal controls and employee training. Should your business still fall victim to trade secret misappropriation, there are civil remedies available, including an infringement suit under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. In some cases, the federal government may also elect to pursue criminal sanctions.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!