
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comChina has long been accused of stealing trade secrets from U.S. companies. To help deter Chinese economic espionage, the Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced a China Initiative. “This Initiative will identify priority Chinese trade theft cases, ensure that we have enough resources dedicated to them, and make sure that we bring them to an appropriate conclusion quickly and effectively,” then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a press statement.

When valuable intellectual property is stolen, the federal government can be a powerful ally. In addition to the civil remedies available to businesses, the federal government can also criminally prosecute employees or other third parties who misappropriate proprietary information.
The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) contains two sections, each addressing a different type of trade secret misappropriation. Section 1831 addresses foreign economic espionage and requires that the theft of a trade secret be done to benefit a foreign government, instrumentality, or agent. Meanwhile, Section 1832 criminalizes trade secret theft “related to or included in a product that is produced for or placed in interstate or foreign commerce, to the economic benefit of anyone other than the owner.” The EEA also allows the federal government to prosecute the knowing possession, receipt, or purchase of misappropriated trade secrets. Penalties under the statute include monetary fines, imprisonment, and disgorgement of any profits derived from the stolen trade secret.
In connection with the new initiative, the DOJ announced an indictment alleging that a Chinese state-owned company, a Taiwan company, and three Taiwan individuals stole trade secrets from Micron, a U.S. semi-conductor company. As highlighted by the DOJ, Micron controls about 20 to 25 percent of the dynamic random access memory (DRAM) industry, which China recently entered in large part due to alleged trade secret theft.
According to the unsealed indictment, Chen Zhengkun, also known as Stephen Chen, served as president of a company acquired by Micron in 2013. He left the company in 2015 and went to work for Taiwan’s United Microelectronics, from where he allegedly orchestrated the theft of trade secrets from Micron worth up to $8.75 billion. United Microelectronics then entered into an agreement with Chinese state-owned Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co., which allowed China to illegally obtain the DRAM technology and then use it to compete against U.S. companies like Micron.
If convicted, the defendants face up to 15 years in prison and $5 million in fines. The companies could face forfeiture and fines worth more than $20 billion. In addition to the criminal charges, the Commerce Department also recently added the Chinese company to the Entity List to prevent it from buying goods and services in the United States.
Assistant Attorney General John Demers, who currently leads the DOJ’s National Security Division, will lead the new initiative. It will also include several U.S. Attorneys and members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
“If China acquires an American company’s most important technology – the very technology that makes it the leader in a field – that company will suffer severe losses, and our national security could even be impacted,” said FBI Director Christopher Wray. “We are committed to continuing to work closely with our federal, state, local, and private sector partners to counter this threat from China.”
As detailed in a DOJ fact sheet, the initiative seeks to accomplish the following:
U.S. companies that conduct business in China or with Chinese companies must be aware of the potential for trade secret theft. The most effective intellectual property protection strategies still start with your business, including tight internal controls and employee training. Should your business still fall victim to trade secret misappropriation, there are civil remedies available, including an infringement suit under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. In some cases, the federal government may also elect to pursue criminal sanctions.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!