
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: March 15, 2021
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comThe Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced its first settlement involving fraud allegations related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). SlideBelts Inc., along with the company’s president and CEO, have agreed to pay a combined $100,000 in damages and penalties to resolve allegations that they committed fraud in connection with a $350,000 PPP loan. SlideBelts also repaid the PPP funds it received.
“The defendants made false statements to multiple banks in order to obtain a Paycheck Protection Program loan that should have been disbursed to an honest small business suffering financially from the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic,” U.S. Attorney McGregor W. Scott said in a press statement. “The Department of Justice and our partners at the SBA will use all tools at our disposal, including civil fraud statutes, to aggressively pursue those who exploit federal programs intended to help those in need during this national emergency.”
As part of the settlement, Taylor and SlideBelts admitted that they made false statements to federally insured banks that SlideBelts was not in bankruptcy in order to influence those banks to approve, and the Small Business Administration (SBA) to guarantee, a PPP loan to SlideBelts. As a result of their false statements, SlideBelts received a PPP loan for $350,000. Months later, in response to demands by the federal government, SlideBelts returned the funds to the lender. Taylor and SlideBelts also admitted that their statements caused false claims to be made to the SBA in connection with the PPP loan.
The resulting DOJ civil enforcement action alleged that Taylor’s and SlideBelts’ misconduct violated the False Claims Act (FCA) and the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). The FCA allows the government to recover damages and penalties for the presentation of false claims for payment to the United States. Meanwhile, FIRREA allows the government to impose civil penalties for violations of enumerated federal criminal statutes, including those that affect federally-insured financial institutions.
The DOJ, SBA, and other federal agencies are aggressively policing COVID-19 relief programs for potential fraud, and the recent settlement is likely just one of many to come, particularly given that the PPP has reopened to disperse another round of loans. In January, the DOJ stated that in the nine months since the PPP began, its Fraud Section attorneys have prosecuted more than 100 defendants in more than 70 criminal cases. It has also seized more than $60 million in cash proceeds derived from fraudulently obtained PPP funds, as well as numerous real estate properties and luxury items purchased with such proceeds.
If your business is participating in PPP or other COVID-19 relief program, be prepared for your application and your expenditures to be closely scrutinized for compliance with the program’s requirements, particularly with regard to loan eligibility and loan forgiveness. As highlighted by the recent DOJ settlement, misrepresentations on applications, certifications, or other program documents may give rise to a criminal fraud investigation or FCA violations. Since even inadvertent misstatements can lead to a costly and embarrassing investigation, it is essential to verify the accuracy of all information submitted, memorialize decision making in connection with the application process in writing, and keep detailed records of how the funds are expended. In addition, knowingly making false statements to federal law enforcement agents constitutes a crime punishable by a term of imprisonment. The DOJ has stated that it will not pursue businesses that have acted in good faith. However, should the DOJ uncover misconduct, the consequences can be significant. As demonstrated by the SlideBelts settlement, it may not be enough to simply repay the PPP loan. Borrowers may also have to pay damages and/or penalties, and executive officers could face personal liability. If you suspect that you or your business may be the subject of a criminal investigation, it imperative to contact an experienced white-collar criminal defense lawyer as soon as possible and certainly before meeting with state or federal law enforcement agents.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Bob Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!