In today’s fast-paced digital news environment, very little is off limits, and stories can spread like wildfire. The Donald Sterling saga is just one recent example.
While interest in the actions of a company’s chief executive officer (CEO) was once confined to the boardroom, their personal lives are increasingly under scrutiny. From alleged illicit relationships to drug use to political affiliations, it’s all fair game.
Stryker Corp.’s chief executive, Stephen P. MacMillan, and Best Buy’s CEO, Brian Dunn, both left their posts after romantic relationships with employees came to light. Whether they were ousted or departed on their own accord is unclear, but the public scrutiny of their personal lives undoubtedly played a role.
Stanford University professor David F. Larcker contends that even a simple divorce can impact corporate governance. In his paper, Separation Anxiety: The Impact of CEO Divorce on Shareholders, he discusses three potential ways that divorce may impact a company and its shareholders:
It might reduce the executive’s control or influence over the organization. Larcker notes that an executive with a considerable ownership stake in a company might be required to sell or transfer a portion of this interest under the terms of a divorce decree. He argues this “can reduce the influence that he or she has over the organization and impact decisions regarding corporate strategy, asset ownership, and board composition.”
It might affect his or her productivity, concentration, and energy levels. Larcker cites a study that found 37 percent of companies report that employee divorce negatively impacts firm productivity. In the most severe cases, the distraction of divorce can lead to premature retirement, noting that among 24 CEOs who got divorced between 2009 and 2012, seven (29 percent) stepped down within two years of the settlement.
It might influence attitudes toward risk. Larcker argues that the sudden change in wealth, which often occurs during a divorce, can change a CEO’s risk aversion, and therefore affect his or her decision-making. For instance, a chief executive might become more open to high-risk investmentsin an effort to reclaim personal wealth lost in the divorce.
Overall, the study suggests that divorce should at least be on every board’s radar. While marital discord alone should not threaten the reputation of a corporation, it may still impact its operations and productivity.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your company’s corporate governance policies, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
