Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Detroit Close To A Deal With Final Creditor
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 17, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
The city of Detroit appears to be approaching a deal with its largest and last holdout creditor, Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.
City attorneys said that they hope to present a settlement in U.S. Bankruptcy Court on Oct. 16 after negotiations with FGIC, according to The Detroit News. Thomas Cullen, a Jones Day attorney who is representing Detroit, described a “firm and active faith” that the city and its holdout creditor will have finalized a deal by that time.
Alfredo Perez, an attorney for FGIC, told Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes that “a lot of progress” has been made in recent closed-door negotiations out of court, the news source reported. FGIC holds a $1.1 billion claim that resulted from a pension deal backed by former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick. The deal reached with this creditor could involve leases on three parking garages in the city, riverfront land, cash and a development deal on city-owned land.
Before this deal, FGIC faced recovering just 6 percent of its holdings compared to the 46 percent recovered by pensioners’ claims, according to The Detroit News. The creditor has maintained that this amounts to unfair treatment, but may be motivated to take any deal that offers better terms than this.
“Mediation with FGIC is progressing but the City is reserving any comment until there is a signed memo of understanding between parties,” Bill Nowling, a spokesman for Detroit Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr, said in a statement, according to The Wall Street Journal. “All I will say is that both sides are close to an agreement.”
The news source explained that this deal could help to end the city’s long trip through bankruptcy court, allowing it to discharge as much as $7 billion of the $18 billion that it owes. Most creditors, including the pensioners, have already settled with the city, and sources told the Journal that Detroit hopes to conclude the case by as early as Thanksgiving.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.