Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Department of Justice Considers Personal Benefit an Important Factor in Prosecuting Employment Tax Cases
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 24, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Since 2008, the U.S. economy has struggled and employers faced with the dilemma of either paying employees and vendors, or paying employment tax often chose the former. The belief is that they can always catch up. Unfortunately, I have seen many employers incur substantial tax liability for employment taxes, interest and penalties, and have found themselves personally liable.
The Department of Justice will now consider whether an individual personally benefited from employment taxes that were not properly withheld or paid as a key factor in considering whether it will criminally prosecute a case.
“Using the money to keep a business afloat is not a defense against criminal liability for an employer, but the DOJ is less likely to prosecute in that case than when the employer is using the funds to purchase homes, cars, and other luxury items,” said Margaret Leigh Kessler, Assistant Chief (Western Criminal Enforcement Section), DOJ Tax Division.
Speaking during the “Civil and Criminal Tax Penalties” session of the American Bar Association Section of Taxation meeting in San Francisco, Kessler pointed out that no one factor is dispositive as to whether a case will become criminal. She said there are many different factors that may cause the IRS to refer a case to the DOJ for criminal prosecution, including engaging in a course of illegal conduct over a long period; taking aggressive measures to actively hide assets once the Service has determined noncompliance; and lying to the IRS agents reviewing the case.
“The size of the business is not a driving factor,” Kessler said. “While a case involving large amounts of money may be more attractive to the DOJ, officials wouldn’t be eager to prosecute it criminally if they didn’t have evidence that the money was being used for personal benefit.”
Those employers who use employment taxes for cars, vacation homes and the like now face not only personal liability but criminal prosecution.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Department of Justice Considers Personal Benefit an Important Factor in Prosecuting Employment Tax Cases
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Since 2008, the U.S. economy has struggled and employers faced with the dilemma of either paying employees and vendors, or paying employment tax often chose the former. The belief is that they can always catch up. Unfortunately, I have seen many employers incur substantial tax liability for employment taxes, interest and penalties, and have found themselves personally liable.
The Department of Justice will now consider whether an individual personally benefited from employment taxes that were not properly withheld or paid as a key factor in considering whether it will criminally prosecute a case.
“Using the money to keep a business afloat is not a defense against criminal liability for an employer, but the DOJ is less likely to prosecute in that case than when the employer is using the funds to purchase homes, cars, and other luxury items,” said Margaret Leigh Kessler, Assistant Chief (Western Criminal Enforcement Section), DOJ Tax Division.
Speaking during the “Civil and Criminal Tax Penalties” session of the American Bar Association Section of Taxation meeting in San Francisco, Kessler pointed out that no one factor is dispositive as to whether a case will become criminal. She said there are many different factors that may cause the IRS to refer a case to the DOJ for criminal prosecution, including engaging in a course of illegal conduct over a long period; taking aggressive measures to actively hide assets once the Service has determined noncompliance; and lying to the IRS agents reviewing the case.
“The size of the business is not a driving factor,” Kessler said. “While a case involving large amounts of money may be more attractive to the DOJ, officials wouldn’t be eager to prosecute it criminally if they didn’t have evidence that the money was being used for personal benefit.”
Those employers who use employment taxes for cars, vacation homes and the like now face not only personal liability but criminal prosecution.