By Jeff Denberg (Flickr) [CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons
Pop star Kesha and songwriter-producer Lukasz Gottwald, aka Dr. Luke, are squaring off for a major lawsuit that includes allegations of rape, abuse, defamation and more. Each party has filed an extremely aggressive case against the other. We’ll discuss each case, but first we should define the trickier allegations.
We’ll go into detail about the rest of the allegations shortly, but for the purposes of understanding the claims being made by each party, it should be noted that Kesha is claiming sexual assault and battery, negligent retention and supervision, sexual harassment, emotional distress and other violations. Gottwald is retaliating with defamation, breach of contract and tortious interference.
Negligent retention and supervision
Most of Kesha’s allegations against Gottwald are pretty straightforward, despite the seriousness of their nature. Negligent retention and supervision is likely the only one that the average person won’t be familiar with.
These are actually two separate, but related, tort offenses. Negligent retention refers to a situation in which a party fails to remove an employee from a position of responsibility or authority after it has come to light that he or she is misusing that authority. Similarly, negligent supervision occurs when a party should have more closely monitored a situation, but failed to, resulting in the same misuse of authority.
Many suits, like Kesha’s, will put both theories forward. In this case, it appears likely that Kesha is claiming that Dr. Luke’s companies or supervisors either knew about his alleged injurious behavior and failed to act or should have known about it.
Defamation
For his part, Gottwald’s counterclaims rest almost entirely on the falseness of Kesha’s rape and abuse allegations. To establish defamation, four elements must generally be proven:
The existence of a false statement purporting to be fact about another person
The publication or communication of that statement to a third person
Intent to harm, or at least negligence, by the person making the statement
Resultant harm to the subject of the statement
Tortious interference
Gottwald’s argument that Kesha is in breach of contract is also fairly straightforward, but his claim of tortious interference is more interesting. This law is reserved for third parties who cause damage via interference with a plaintiff’s contractual or business relationships.
This is rather specific. In a famous English case involving the same law, Tarleton v McGawley, the defendant was found guilty of tortious interference for shooting from his ship off the coast of Africa at natives who were traveling to trade with the plaintiff in order to deter them.
The claim of tortious interference is directed at Pebe Sebert, Kesha’s mother; Vector, Kesha’s new managing company; and Jack Rovner, the president of Vector. In effect, the lawsuit suggests that the previously mentioned worked to damage the working relationship between Gottwald and Kesha.
Kesha’s case
Kesha’s complaint paints an extremely dark picture of her time with Gottwald. It alleges that he induced her to drop out of high school before focusing on the careers of more famous artists. There are several stories regarding Gottwald’s alleged lewd and inappropriate sexual conduct toward other parties that, while apparently unrelated to the case, are extremely disturbing.
Two specific cases of sexual misconduct toward Kesha stand out. First, the complaint describes how Gottwald allegedly forced her to inhale drugs before a flight, on which he repeatedly attempted to force himself on her despite her clear intoxication. Second, it describes a situation in which he allegedly forced Kesha to drink with him before giving her “sober pills.” Kesha describes waking up naked in Gottwald’s bed the next day and calling her mother. The complaint also states that Kesha later discovered that the pills were a variant of the “date rape” drug GHB.
There are also evocative descriptions of physical and psychological abuse, which the complaint claims Gottwald used to control Kesha and her career. It seeks special, general, punitive and exemplary damages, declaratory relief voiding Kesha’s contract with Gottwald and his companies and costs.
Gottwald’s case
If Kesha’s case seems aggressive, Gottwald’s is equally so. It paints a picture of Gottwald as having devoted significant time and money into Kesha’s career and suggests that Kesha and her mother Pebe are financially motivated in their claims.
“These defamatory statements contain lurid allegations of physical and mental abuse of Kesha – allegations that Kesha and Pebe have themselves admitted are false,” the complaint reads. Emphasis present in original, no less.
Interestingly, Kesha’s case contains direct language that states that Gottwald refused to renegotiate Kesha’s contract. In Gottwald’s complaint, however, there are multiple amendments to the contract mentioned.
The complaint also states that Pebe has communicated threats to Gottwald and his representatives, promising to publish further accusations of a similar nature should he refuse to make business concessions and release Kesha from the contract. He seeks special, punitive and compensatory damages and costs.
Cases like this one can only be described as incendiary. It is difficult for anyone who reads the case not to take a side, but it bears noting that we have seen no evidence of either parties’ claims so far. Clearly, one side is lying. In my professional opinion, it is essential to remain prudent and watch the proceedings objectively before reaching a conclusion.
As an entertainment attorney in New York, I’ve noticed that many pop stars find themselves in legal battles over defamation. Check out some of my previous posts on some of the most popular stars in the sports and entertainment world and their legal bouts regarding defamation:
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Defamation, Abuse & Negligent Retention: The Life of Pop Stars
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
By Jeff Denberg (Flickr) [CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons
Pop star Kesha and songwriter-producer Lukasz Gottwald, aka Dr. Luke, are squaring off for a major lawsuit that includes allegations of rape, abuse, defamation and more. Each party has filed an extremely aggressive case against the other. We’ll discuss each case, but first we should define the trickier allegations.
We’ll go into detail about the rest of the allegations shortly, but for the purposes of understanding the claims being made by each party, it should be noted that Kesha is claiming sexual assault and battery, negligent retention and supervision, sexual harassment, emotional distress and other violations. Gottwald is retaliating with defamation, breach of contract and tortious interference.
Negligent retention and supervision
Most of Kesha’s allegations against Gottwald are pretty straightforward, despite the seriousness of their nature. Negligent retention and supervision is likely the only one that the average person won’t be familiar with.
These are actually two separate, but related, tort offenses. Negligent retention refers to a situation in which a party fails to remove an employee from a position of responsibility or authority after it has come to light that he or she is misusing that authority. Similarly, negligent supervision occurs when a party should have more closely monitored a situation, but failed to, resulting in the same misuse of authority.
Many suits, like Kesha’s, will put both theories forward. In this case, it appears likely that Kesha is claiming that Dr. Luke’s companies or supervisors either knew about his alleged injurious behavior and failed to act or should have known about it.
Defamation
For his part, Gottwald’s counterclaims rest almost entirely on the falseness of Kesha’s rape and abuse allegations. To establish defamation, four elements must generally be proven:
The existence of a false statement purporting to be fact about another person
The publication or communication of that statement to a third person
Intent to harm, or at least negligence, by the person making the statement
Resultant harm to the subject of the statement
Tortious interference
Gottwald’s argument that Kesha is in breach of contract is also fairly straightforward, but his claim of tortious interference is more interesting. This law is reserved for third parties who cause damage via interference with a plaintiff’s contractual or business relationships.
This is rather specific. In a famous English case involving the same law, Tarleton v McGawley, the defendant was found guilty of tortious interference for shooting from his ship off the coast of Africa at natives who were traveling to trade with the plaintiff in order to deter them.
The claim of tortious interference is directed at Pebe Sebert, Kesha’s mother; Vector, Kesha’s new managing company; and Jack Rovner, the president of Vector. In effect, the lawsuit suggests that the previously mentioned worked to damage the working relationship between Gottwald and Kesha.
Kesha’s case
Kesha’s complaint paints an extremely dark picture of her time with Gottwald. It alleges that he induced her to drop out of high school before focusing on the careers of more famous artists. There are several stories regarding Gottwald’s alleged lewd and inappropriate sexual conduct toward other parties that, while apparently unrelated to the case, are extremely disturbing.
Two specific cases of sexual misconduct toward Kesha stand out. First, the complaint describes how Gottwald allegedly forced her to inhale drugs before a flight, on which he repeatedly attempted to force himself on her despite her clear intoxication. Second, it describes a situation in which he allegedly forced Kesha to drink with him before giving her “sober pills.” Kesha describes waking up naked in Gottwald’s bed the next day and calling her mother. The complaint also states that Kesha later discovered that the pills were a variant of the “date rape” drug GHB.
There are also evocative descriptions of physical and psychological abuse, which the complaint claims Gottwald used to control Kesha and her career. It seeks special, general, punitive and exemplary damages, declaratory relief voiding Kesha’s contract with Gottwald and his companies and costs.
Gottwald’s case
If Kesha’s case seems aggressive, Gottwald’s is equally so. It paints a picture of Gottwald as having devoted significant time and money into Kesha’s career and suggests that Kesha and her mother Pebe are financially motivated in their claims.
“These defamatory statements contain lurid allegations of physical and mental abuse of Kesha – allegations that Kesha and Pebe have themselves admitted are false,” the complaint reads. Emphasis present in original, no less.
Interestingly, Kesha’s case contains direct language that states that Gottwald refused to renegotiate Kesha’s contract. In Gottwald’s complaint, however, there are multiple amendments to the contract mentioned.
The complaint also states that Pebe has communicated threats to Gottwald and his representatives, promising to publish further accusations of a similar nature should he refuse to make business concessions and release Kesha from the contract. He seeks special, punitive and compensatory damages and costs.
Cases like this one can only be described as incendiary. It is difficult for anyone who reads the case not to take a side, but it bears noting that we have seen no evidence of either parties’ claims so far. Clearly, one side is lying. In my professional opinion, it is essential to remain prudent and watch the proceedings objectively before reaching a conclusion.
As an entertainment attorney in New York, I’ve noticed that many pop stars find themselves in legal battles over defamation. Check out some of my previous posts on some of the most popular stars in the sports and entertainment world and their legal bouts regarding defamation:
