Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 12, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNew Jersey businesses are increasingly allowing employees to use their own devices to perform work tasks, such as responding to client emails, scheduling meetings, and preparing reports. The practice even has its own catchy moniker, “BYOD.”
While carrying a single device may be convenient for workers, many businesses and their employees fail to appreciate the risks of BYOD. Moreover, an organization’s lack of proper policies and procedures can greatly increase the risk of data breaches and other security concerns.
According to a new report from Webroot, a leading provider of real-time threat detection, more than 60 percent of IT managers surveyed reported the use of personal devices by their employees, and 58 percent indicated they were “very” or ”extremely” concerned about the security risk from this practice. The cause for concern is warranted. The survey also found that most employee devices are lacking real security with only 19 percent reported installing a full security app and 64 percent of employees admitted to using only the security features that came with their devices.
To balance the convenience of BYOD and the risks, New Jersey businesses are advised to adopt comprehensive data protection policies and employee training. At minimum, a BYOD[1] policy should include:
Of course, a BYOD policy is only effective if employees follow it. As highlighted by Webroot, “[i]nvest in educating employees about the risks associated with mobile devices and the benefits of securing devices. An informed user is more likely to buy into BYOD security requirements.”
If you have any questions about this study or would like assistance with your data security efforts, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouseWatch (http://ewhwblog.com).
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!