Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

OSHA Unveils COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Rule – What Employers Need to Know

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: November 10, 2021

Key Contacts

Back

Back in September, President Biden directed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to develop a rule requiring that all employers with 100 or more employees to require vaccination or, as an alternative, weekly testing…

Back in September, President Biden directed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to develop a rule requiring that all employers with 100 or more employees to require vaccination or, as an alternative, weekly testing. On November 4, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor finally published the emergency temporary standard (ETS) implementing the Biden Administration’s mandate. The ETS also requires that these employers provide paid time for employees to get vaccinated and recover from vaccination side effects, and mandates that all unvaccinated workers wear a face mask in the workplace. 

According to the DOL, the ETS will cover two-thirds of the nation’s private-sector workforce. “While vaccination remains the most effective and efficient defense against COVID-19, this emergency temporary standard will protect all workers, including those who remain unvaccinated, by requiring regular testing and the use of face coverings by unvaccinated workers to prevent the spread of the virus,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Jim Frederick said in a press statement. “As part of OSHA’s mission to protect the safety and health of workers, this rule will provide a roadmap to help businesses keep their workers safe.”

When is the ETS effective? – Compliance Deadlines

The ETS took effect immediately upon its publication in the Federal Register. Employers must comply with most requirements within 30 days of publication and with testing requirements within 60 days of publication.

That means that the testing requirement for unvaccinated workers takes effect January 4, 2022. Employers must be in compliance with all other requirements – such as providing paid time for employees to get vaccinated and enforcing masking for unvaccinated workers – on or before December 5, 2021.

Which employers are covered by the ETS?

The ETS applies to employers with 100 or more employees.

How does the ETS interact with other vaccine mandates?

On November 4, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at the Department of Health and Human Services also published a rule implementing its requirement that health care workers at facilities participating in Medicare and Medicaid be fully vaccinated. The rule applies to employees regardless of whether their positions are clinical or non-clinical and includes employees, students, trainees, and volunteers who work at a covered facility that receives federal funding from Medicare or Medicaid. 

OSHA has clarified that it will not apply its new ETS to workplaces covered by either the CMS rule or the federal contractor vaccination requirement. This is good news as it means employers won’t have to track multiple vaccination requirements for the same employees. OSHA also emphasized that its new rules preempt any inconsistent state or local laws, including laws that ban or limit an employer’s authority to require vaccination, masks, or testing.

Which employees count towards the 100-employee count?

In determining the number of employees, employers must include all employees across all of their U.S. locations, regardless of employees’ vaccination status or where they perform their work. Part-time employees do count towards the company total, but independent contractors do not.

Which employees are required to adhere to the ETS?

Even where the standard applies to a particular employer, its requirements may not apply to certain employees. The ETS establishes exceptions for employees (i) who do not report to a workplace where other individuals such as coworkers or customers are present; (ii) while working from home; or (iii) who work exclusively outdoors.

Should employers exclude employees who fall under the above exceptions from their employee counts?

No.
The ETS provides that the determination as to whether a particular employer is covered by the standard should be made separately from whether individual employees are covered by the standard’s requirements. OSHA provides the following examples:

  • If an employer has 75 part-time employees and 25 full-time employees, the employer would be within the scope of this ETS because it has 100 employees.
  • If an employer has 150 employees, 100 of whom work from their homes full-time and 50 of whom work in the office at least part of the time, the employer would be within the scope of this ETS because it has more than 100 employees.
  • If an employer has 102 employees and only 3 ever report to an office location, that employer would be covered.
  • If an employer has 200 employees, all of whom are vaccinated, that employer would be covered.
  • If an employer has 125 employees, and 115 of them work exclusively outdoors, that employer would be covered.

What does the ETS require?

A. Mandatory Vaccination Policy

Under the ETS, employers must establish, implement, and enforce a written mandatory vaccination policy. The policy must require vaccination of all employees, including vaccination of all new employees as soon as practicable.

In FAQs published by OSHA in conjunction with the ETS, OSHA advises that vaccination policies should include:

  • Requirements for COVID-19 vaccination;
  • Applicable exclusions from the written policy (e.g., medical contraindications, medical necessity requiring delay in vaccination, or reasonable accommodations for workers with disabilities or sincerely held religious beliefs);
  • Information on determining an employee’s vaccination status and how this information will be collected;
  • Paid time and sick leave for vaccination purposes;
  • Notification of positive COVID-19 tests and removal of COVID-19 positive employees from the workplace;
  • Information to be provided to employees, e.g., how the employer is making that information available to employees; and
  • Disciplinary action for employees who do not abide by the policy.

OSHA further advises that the employer should include all relevant information regarding the policy’s effective date, who the policy applies to, deadlines (e.g., for submitting vaccination information, for getting vaccinated), and procedures for compliance and enforcement, all of which are necessary components of an effective plan.

B. Masking Requirement

Employers must also ensure that each employee who is not fully vaccinated wears a face covering when indoors and when occupying a vehicle with another person for work purposes, except:

  • When an employee is alone in a room with floor to ceiling walls and a closed door.
  • For a limited time while the employee is eating or drinking at the workplace or for identification purposes in compliance with safety and security requirements.
  • When an employee is wearing a respirator or facemask.
  • Where the employer can show that the use of face coverings is infeasible or creates a greater hazard that would excuse compliance (e.g., when it is important to see the employee’s mouth for reasons related to their job duties, when the work requires the use of the employee’s uncovered mouth, or when the use of a face covering presents a risk of serious injury or death to the employee).

Are there any exceptions to mandatory vaccination?

Yes, exceptions may be provided for those employees:

  • For whom a vaccine is medically contraindicated;
  • For whom medical necessity requires a delay in vaccination; or
  • Who are legally entitled to a reasonable accommodation under federal civil rights laws because they have a disability or sincerely held religious beliefs, practices, or observances that conflict with the vaccination requirement.

What is required for employees that are not fully vaccinated?

All covered employers must ensure that any unvaccinated employees begin producing a verified negative test to their employer on at least a weekly basis.

Do employers have to pay for the weekly testing alternative?

It depends.  While the ETS does not require employers to pay for any costs associated with testing, employer payment for testing may be required by other laws, regulations, or collective bargaining agreements or other collectively negotiated agreements. OSHA has also noted that the ETS also does not prohibit the employer from paying for costs associated with testing required by the ETS. Otherwise, the agency leaves the decision regarding who pays for the testing to the employer.

What happens if an employee tests positive for COVID-19?

Regardless of COVID-19 vaccination status or any COVID-19 testing required under the ETS, employers must immediately remove from the workplace any employee who receives a positive COVID-19 test or is diagnosed with COVID-19 by a licensed healthcare provider and keep the employee removed until the employee:

  • Receives a negative result on a COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) following a positive result on a COVID-19 antigen test if the employee chooses to seek a NAAT test for confirmatory testing;
  • Meets the return to work criteria in CDC’s “Isolation Guidance”; or
  • Receives a recommendation to return to work from a licensed healthcare provider.

Are employers required to provide paid time off for vaccination and vaccination side effects?

Yes, all covered employers are required to provide paid time for their employees to get vaccinated and, if needed, sick leave to recover from side effects experienced that keep them from working.

What’s Next?

To date, legal challenges to the OSHA COVID-19 ETS have been filed in the 5th, 6th, 8th and 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the constitutionality of the ETS.  The ETS has even been stayed by the 5th Circuit which includes Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. 

Thus far, no such challenge has been filed by New Jersey or New York. Nonetheless, covered employers should prepare to implement a mandate or testing regimen, while staying apprised of legal updates.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jorge R. de Armas or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey post image

Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey"
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney post image

What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney"
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract post image

Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]

Author: Graham Staton

Link to post with title - "Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract"
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement? post image

Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?"
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One post image

Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One"
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know post image

Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]

Author: Donald M. Pepe

Link to post with title - "Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!