Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Court Denies Creditors' Document Request in Alabama Bankruptcy Case
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: February 8, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
In the ongoing bankruptcy case of Jefferson County Alabama, Wall Street creditors who petitioned the court for access to county documents relating to city sewer-system rates will not be permitted to view the records, a bankruptcy court has ruled.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Thomas Bennett denied a request by creditors to examine the documents used by policymakers in the county to determine and set sewer-system rates, which the creditors argue are too low, according to Reuters. The trustee for the bondholders, Bank of New York Mellon, argues that the rates – which are a central part of the county’s municipal bankruptcy filing – and the information used to set them are central to future court proceedings, during which creditors will try to increase the rates. The bondholders argue that the rates passed on November 6 are too low and will not enable the county to make principal and interest payments on the debt in the future.
Roughly $3.14 billion of the county’s debt is the result of sewer system construction and financing costs.
Judge Bennett disagreed with the creditors’ claims and sided with the county, which said the claims are without merit and violate laws that guarantee policymakers an element of privacy when making certain decisions, Reuters reports.
“The trustee would run roughshod over the privileges protecting the county’s communications with its lawyers and the lawyers’ communications with retained experts,” the county said in a brief.
Although the county will not be required to release this information to creditors, Judge Bennett did not specify if officials at the consulting firm CH2M Hill – which worked on the sewer projects – would be required to answer questions during upcoming bankruptcy hearings. He said he would rule on the matter if it was brought forth in future proceedings.
Jefferson County, Alabama, filed for Chapter 9 protection under bankruptcy law in 2011. Although proceedings are still ongoing, the county has been forced to cut expenses significantly and slash hundreds of jobs in the meantime.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.