Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 30, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comBut is having a cyber insurance policy a wise choice to protect your company in the wake of a costly data breach? One danger is that the policy tries to limit its exposure by imposing requirements that may be practically impossible to administer.
As an example, in California, Columbia Casualty Co., a member of the CNA Group, is seeking to enforce an exclusion in its policy that requires its insured to meet “minimum required practices.”
The lawsuit stems from a data breach suffered by Cottage Health System, which involved approximately 32,500 confidential medical records. According to court documents, Cottage Health Systems and its third-party vendor failed to implement proper security measures, such as data encryption, to protect patient data that was accessible via the Internet. A resulting class-action lawsuit settled for $4.1 million, which Columbia Casualty agreed to fund subject to a complete reservation of rights.
In Columbia Casualty Company v. Cottage Health Systems, No. 2:15-cv-03432, the insurance company is now seeking reimbursement based on a policy exclusion stating:
“Any failure of an Insured to continuously implement the procedures and risk controls identified in the Insured’s application for this Insurance and all related information submitted to the Insurer in conjunction with such application whether orally or in writing…”
Columbia Casualty maintains that because the healthcare company failed to monitor and continuously update its cybersecurity protocols, insurance coverage should be excluded. It points to representations that Cottage Health Systems allegedly made in its application – notably that the company regularly evaluated its exposure to data security and privacy risks.
For businesses that hope to rely on cyber insurance in exactly this type of situation — where the company or another third party’s negligence inadvertently leads to a data breach — the suit is troublesome as it appears to eviscerate the very protection many companies are seeking.
In terms of case law, cyber insurance is still relatively new. As a result, there may be little existing case law interpreting the relevant exclusions. To assess your rights and obligations under a cyber insurance policy, it may be prudent to review the terms and consult with experienced counsel to try to anticipate significant coverage concerns.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!