Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 25, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNYSE Governance Services recently released its annual What Directors Think Survey, which sheds light on the challenges facing the boardroom as well as what corporate directors are doing to manage risk.
The report, which was prepared in conjunction with consulting firm Spencer Stuart, surveyed nearly 500 corporate directors, 70 percent of whom identified themselves as outside directors, and another 20 percent who said they serve as board chair or lead director. The respondents are fairly experienced, with 44 percent have served on a board for more than 10 years, and an additional 33 percent holding directorship for five to 10 years.
As the report highlights, serving as a corporate director is becoming a more challenging job as boards struggle to respond to the risks that accompany new technology, regulations, and shareholder demands. In fact, 55 percent of the directors surveyed do not believe a public company board can ever fully anticipate the many facets of risk in the current corporate environment.
Directors are also being asked to wear a number of different hats. While respondents still cited industry expertise as the most important attribute of a potential director, it was quickly followed by financial expertise, IT/cyber experience, gender diversity, and CEO experience. Other qualifications that are in greater demand compared to previous surveys include legal/regulatory experience and racial diversity.
“The expectations placed on boards in terms of what they are asked to oversee is much greater today due to many factors, including an increasingly dynamic global economy, political uncertainty, disruption caused by new technologies, and an active M&A environment,” says Kevin M. Connelly, CEO, Spencer Stuart. “As a result, directors find themselves needing to be knowledgeable in areas they may or may not have had much past exposure to or experience in, such as cybersecurity.”
Given the growing risks that emanate from foreign governments, organized crime and competitors, cybersecurity and data privacy are on the radar of nearly every corporate director, with more than 80 percent citing it as a concern on their agenda (only second to operational risk). Despite recognizing the risk, the directors surveyed still expressed realistic concern about their ability to oversee and minimize it. Only 15 percent were very confident that their board was adequately addressing cyber threats. Approximately 63 percent were only somewhat confident, while the remaining respondents were not confident at all.
As we see both the public and private sectors struggling to effectively manage their cybersecurity risks, and as reports of major breaches have increasingly become a daily occurrence, it is surprising that some corporate leaders can actually feel “somewhat confident” that things are getting under control. Perhaps, in order to mitigate this real and growing danger, business leaders should consider convening a summit meeting of both public and private sectors to better understand the nature of the threat and to formulate more effective risk mitigation solutions?
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
NYSE Governance Services recently released its annual What Directors Think Survey, which sheds light on the challenges facing the boardroom as well as what corporate directors are doing to manage risk.
The report, which was prepared in conjunction with consulting firm Spencer Stuart, surveyed nearly 500 corporate directors, 70 percent of whom identified themselves as outside directors, and another 20 percent who said they serve as board chair or lead director. The respondents are fairly experienced, with 44 percent have served on a board for more than 10 years, and an additional 33 percent holding directorship for five to 10 years.
As the report highlights, serving as a corporate director is becoming a more challenging job as boards struggle to respond to the risks that accompany new technology, regulations, and shareholder demands. In fact, 55 percent of the directors surveyed do not believe a public company board can ever fully anticipate the many facets of risk in the current corporate environment.
Directors are also being asked to wear a number of different hats. While respondents still cited industry expertise as the most important attribute of a potential director, it was quickly followed by financial expertise, IT/cyber experience, gender diversity, and CEO experience. Other qualifications that are in greater demand compared to previous surveys include legal/regulatory experience and racial diversity.
“The expectations placed on boards in terms of what they are asked to oversee is much greater today due to many factors, including an increasingly dynamic global economy, political uncertainty, disruption caused by new technologies, and an active M&A environment,” says Kevin M. Connelly, CEO, Spencer Stuart. “As a result, directors find themselves needing to be knowledgeable in areas they may or may not have had much past exposure to or experience in, such as cybersecurity.”
Given the growing risks that emanate from foreign governments, organized crime and competitors, cybersecurity and data privacy are on the radar of nearly every corporate director, with more than 80 percent citing it as a concern on their agenda (only second to operational risk). Despite recognizing the risk, the directors surveyed still expressed realistic concern about their ability to oversee and minimize it. Only 15 percent were very confident that their board was adequately addressing cyber threats. Approximately 63 percent were only somewhat confident, while the remaining respondents were not confident at all.
As we see both the public and private sectors struggling to effectively manage their cybersecurity risks, and as reports of major breaches have increasingly become a daily occurrence, it is surprising that some corporate leaders can actually feel “somewhat confident” that things are getting under control. Perhaps, in order to mitigate this real and growing danger, business leaders should consider convening a summit meeting of both public and private sectors to better understand the nature of the threat and to formulate more effective risk mitigation solutions?
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!